Can I Charge a Fee For Debit & Credit Card Processing?
Answer these 10 questions to explore the U.S. regulatory, consumer satisfaction, and cost implications of charging a fee for your bill payment service.
Do consumers get added convenience for the bill pay convenience fee?
Visa rules (on page 304) state convenience fees must be for alternative payment channels. This is why thousands of organizations charge fees for web, IVR and mobile bill payment systems, but not for paper checks sent via mail. The definitions at the bottom of this post distinguish convenience fees, service fees, and surcharges. Surcharges are allowed for in-person payments.
Do consumers get value in exchange for the bill payment fee?
Added convenience or avoiding a late fee are two of many sources of value that can support a consumer fee. For example, a consumer finance company increased customer satisfaction by introducing an expedited payment fee; this was in exchange for a new payment method that helps consumers avoid late fees. 27 million households will pay $800 million in expedited payment fees to avoid over $6 billion in late fees in 2015, according to Javelin Strategy & Research’s Expedited Payments Overview & Forecast: A Win-Win for Consumers, Banks & Billers. If you are not adding new value at the time you are adding a fee, you may run the risk of upsetting some consumers. One of the largest companies in the U.S. migrated consumers from no fee to charging a fee for making bill payments with no consumer complaints. However, Verizon Wireless experienced consumer backlash when adding a consumer fee without adding incremental new value in exchange for the fee.
Will consumers who do not use this bill pay service benefit?
Many organizations elect to charge a bill pay service fee for card payments to avoid spreading the card interchange fees across the entire customer base. The bill pay service fee avoids inflating the base prices all consumers pay for products and services.
Can you navigate state laws on credit card processing?
A handful of states have laws that prohibit organizations from charging a surcharge for credit card processing. Organizations have responded by selecting a 3rd party provider to charge the service fee, dis-associating their brand from the fee. Thousands of organizations accept payments with a consumer fee from 3rd party walk-in payment providers like MoneyGram and from 3rd party providers that offer web, IVR and mobile bill payment systems.
Do consumers want to use a credit or debit card for your bill pay service?
Credit, debit, and prepaid debit cards will be used to pay for 43% of all bills by 2016, according to Aite Group’s How Americans Pay Their Bills report.
Is there a precedent in your industry for charging a fee?
Consumer finance, higher education, insurance, government, utility, telecom, accounts receivables management and other industries already have the precedent of bill pay service fees for consumers making bill payments.
Do you offer other bill payment service options with no fee?
Offering options that are free for consumers to pay their bill, such as through a check sent via mail, gives consumer the choice as to whether they elect to pay the fee or not.
Does charging a fee for your bill payment service benefit your business model?
Many organizations operate on thin margins. They want to satisfy consumers looking to pay with a card, yet absorbing these fees is not easy to justify financially.
Is the fee for a non-recurring bill payment?
Visa’s rules prohibit charging a convenience fee for Visa recurring card payments (see page 305 of the Visa Rules). There may be an exception for recurring tax payments.
Is the fee clearly disclosed to the consumer?
Not only does this prevent upsetting consumers, it complies with Visa rules.
Conclusion: Do you have more questions? We’re happy to share what we’ve learned working with 3,600 organizations accepting bill payments across the U.S. Email your questions to [email protected].>
- Convenience fees: convenient or alternate payment channel is what enables the merchant or organization to charge a fee.
- Surcharge: accepting a credit card payment is what enables the merchant or organization to charge a surcharge according to Visa. This is distinguished from a convenience fee in that no added convenience must be added to charge a surcharge.
- Service fees: 3rd party payment processor charges the fee in exchange for the service of processing the payment. This is similar to Fedex charging for the service of delivering packages.
This should not be considered legal advice...I am a payments geek, not a lawyer.
Related Blog Posts
Taking a Holistic View of ISO 20022 Migration and Payments Modernization in the Pacific
Today’s payments modernization efforts, most notably real-time payments, not only work to satisfy changing consumer preferences and behaviors, they also serve to future-proof national economies throughout the world. But for real-time payments to deliver maximum value, consumers and financial institutions must be able to exchange meaningful and actionable information — hence the development of ISO 20022, a standard for electronic data interchange that facilitates the fast, standardized and secure exchange of financial messages across borders.
How ISO 20022 Represents Both a Challenge and an Opportunity for Southeast Asia’s Payments Landscape
Governments across Southeast Asia (SEA) are increasingly recognizing the vital role that payments play in the engines of their economies, which has resulted in a number of payments modernization initiatives such as those in Vietnam and Malaysia (PayNet). Yet there is one particular area in which SEA’s financial institutions might still be lagging behind their global counterparts: the adoption of ISO 20022, which has become the global standard for high-value payments and immediate payments (IP) when it comes to cross-border payments.
Ready or Not, The Time Is Now for Real-Time Payments
Research from ACI and GlobalData confirms that demand for real-time payments is only going in one direction: up. The root cause of this increasing demand is rising customer expectations and behaviors; clunky and opaque payment experiences are becoming less tolerable in a world where customers can buy, watch and listen to almost anything with a swipe, tap or click.
When It Comes to Payments, COVID-19 Crisis Could Lead to Long-Term Shifts in Consumer Behavior [Q&A]
ACI Worldwide and GlobalData recently launched Prime Time for Real-Time, a new global report tracking and analyzing real-time payments volumes, growth and dynamics across 30 global markets. According to the global research, an industry first, more than half a trillion real-time payments transactions will be processed over the next five years. I discussed what the findings mean, and how the COVID-19 pandemic might be a further catalyst for behavioral change, with ACI’s global head of real-time payments, Craig Ramsey.
TCH RTP and FedNow: What’s Next for U.S. Immediate Payments?
It has taken some time, but immediate payments (IP) are on the move in the United States. Although the speed of adoption has been slightly behind the curve of regions like India, the Nordics and the U.K., the U.S. has seen significant year-on-year IP growth of 69 percent.
Social, Mobile and Instant Payments: How Digital Payment Overlay Services Will Power Up P27
For some years now, the Nordics region has been a global-standard bearer for payments and financial services innovation. Sweden has for many years been a leader in the progressive move towards cashlessness, championing the range of efficiencies that it brings. Major payments innovators like Klarna, FundedByMe and iZettle are based in the region, rubber-stamping Stockholm as a genuine fintech hub. Analysts and insight leaders also regularly single the Nordics out as a genuine leader, in particular praising the collaboration between governments, regulators, financial institutions and businesses that has led to such fertile ground for financial modernization initiatives.
How to Meet ISO 20022 Migration Deadlines for Fedwire and SWIFT
Over the next decade, we will undoubtedly see huge shifts in how financial institutions throughout North America transact, whether domestically or across international borders. This will be driven not just by changing technologies, but also by regulatory events – such as the widespread adoption of financial messaging standards like ISO 20022.
How Can European Banks Meet the ISO 20022 Migration Deadlines for TARGET2 and SWIFT?
First published in 2004 – and already broadly used in some quarters – ISO 20022 is rapidly set to become the de facto standard for financial messaging around the world, replacing MT messages.
The Pathway to Global Real-Time Payments: What Will Be the Impact of SWIFT and ISO 20022?
The whole world is moving toward the ISO 20022 standard, and almost in unison. Globally, most major currencies are planning to shift to the new data-rich standard for either high-value payments or immediate payments (high value being global messaging via the SWIFT network or an RTGS scheme).
Digital Payments Overlay Services: Accelerating Real-Time Payments Growth
The global real-time payments landscape is transforming every day, as the world moves toward payments that offer a multitude of digital payment overlay services that drive consumer experience and adoption. But what are digital payment overlay services? They are ancillary services that often ride the real-time payments rails, and can be flexible, nimble drivers of innovation. These digital services – piggy-backing on the standard real-time payments rails – not only add value to core payments, but also bring about convenience and ease of use for all participants in the payments ecosystem.