Dedicated Followers of Fintech: Why Transaction Banking Never Goes Out of Fashion
Taking part in a panel at a recent corporate treasury conference, I was introduced as a ‘consumer payments expert’ – not an obvious qualification for sharing stage-time with serious corporate liquidity and cash management folk, but as the talk track was on mobile wallets and Open Banking, I had some reasonably safe and relevant content on which to fall back.
One of my fellow speakers was the immaculately dressed treasurer from fashion house Chanel, who brought fascinating insights on the spending demands of very high-value consumers from around the world. It reminded of that age-old separation between high value (commercial) and low value (retail) payments operations.
Perhaps it is the highly mobile global consumers of luxury brands who are now helping to accelerate a convergence between commercial and retail payments, and exposing more banks to the acceptance of – once exotic – alternative payment methods.
Although the average conference attendee was not as well labelled as my elegant fashion house colleague, I was struck by how most of the (predominantly male) attendees were still so well acquainted with suits and ties. Uncharacteristically, I had anticipated and planned for some dress-code ambiguity, so I could mingle without too many raised eyebrows, wearing what I’d like to think would be described as ‘post-Fintech-2020-Actionwear,’ or what others might have simply called ‘suit and tie.’
Dress code dissonance was, however, a minor sensation compared to the wider realization that my ‘safe and relevant’ on-stage topics may not have been as well understood as I’d assumed. Attendees were certainly very polite and curious about the applicability of new concepts into the world of treasury, but it didn’t feel that Open Banking, alternative payments and APIs were commonplace in a typical treasurer’s closet.
Retail banking doesn’t own the catwalk
I started to wonder, perhaps a little unfairly, whether the buttoned-up behavior was reflective of an industry a bit reluctant to embrace changing payments fashions. And I started to question recent data that showed strong demand from corporates for improved liquidity, better credit decisions, aggregation of multi-banks accounts, visibility of real-time payment information and so on.
In conversations at the conference, most delegates were keen on the logic of new digital banking services and the benefits of real-time payments, but it still felt like there was an inertia and an assumption that change might not happen so quickly. I wondered about the possible reasons for this stasis at the point of interaction between corporates and their banks. Is there a rationale for retail banking moving very quickly to digital applications, online statements and mobile payments, whilst treasury still seems to prefer a world of paper and spreadsheets?
I realized I was being unfair. The apparently conservative uniform of treasury has little correlation with the changing complexity of corporate life. And I’m not comfortable with a view that characterizes retail banking alone as the innovative driver for digital change: A truer picture needs to show the nuanced reality of two intertwined markets, with transaction banking and retail payments requiring a shared, powerful engine room to power through the services demanded by modern treasurers.
Perhaps too many of us have assumed that the action has all been in the retail banking world. I suspect if we looked deeper into the raw numbers for adoption and transaction volumes, we may find that digital-only retail banking is still a minority sport. It may be changing at a fast pace, but for every bright pink Monzo account, there’s an awful lot of customers in the UK still clinging to their chequebook. And for all the availability of new payments infrastructure like faster payments, we haven’t exactly seen a seismic shift of consumer behaviour away from the default patterns of cards, toward inexpensive, direct-from-account push payments.
The pace of change in commercial banking appears to be even more glacial, but this superficial view overlooks the complexities of modern trade. The innovative trend-setters are looking to improve cash flow and access to credit, and to improve efficiency and profitable growth across wide and long supply chains.
Treasurers are clued up on public policy initiatives that aim to unlock capital and liquidity within global payment systems. However, businesses can be excused for prioritizing their own internal infrastructural efficiencies before turning toward potential collaborative efforts with their banking partners, and exploring new concepts like Open Banking and real-time consumer payments.
Although these trends may appear superficial, it is time to consider their serious impact on the changing fashions of banking. Ten years after the financial services disaster, it is time for banks to accelerate the rate of change and to make possibilities happen – particularly in the corporate sector.
Sure, there is still a need to help move consumer markets toward lower-cost real-time concepts, but the big prize for banks cannot be limited to a vision of new retail banking fees. A bigger prize lies in helping businesses to get closer to their markets, sharing in the improved performance of these companies, and helping businesses to interact with wider mass markets (including consumers) where real-time payments have become the norm.
This requires extra effort at the bank-corporate interface, and not inconsiderable change. And unfortunately, the concepts are not quite as snazzily understandable as retail products, such as mobile apps and wallets. But that makes the prize for successful corporate bankers even more desirable, because mastering the complexity whilst being able to curate uniquely customized solutions for businesses will give them a competitive silhouette, which is not only noticeable but memorable too.
Time for banks to embrace new fashions
Back at the conference, my Chanel colleague showed a lovely video about the concept of “Baudruchage” (it’s always great to come back from conferences with at least one extra bit of vocabulary). It’s the process used to seal perfume bottles, which still requires manual effort, wax and string. It’s probably not the most efficient way to guarantee quality, tamper-proof authenticity, but in a world of ever important ‘personalization,’ it’s a vital part of Chanel’s overall brand, service and product.
As Coco Chanel once said, “in order to be irreplaceable, one must be different.” She may have been referring to clothing, but her sentiments resonate with today’s need for banks to embrace the new real-time fashions and to support new customized services.
It’s time for more corporate banks to gear up for the banking equivalent of this modern service curation, helping more businesses to make their own possibilities happen. It’s also time for more treasurers to loosen those ties, roll-up those sleeves and ask more of their banking suppliers – financial services that span corporate and retail payments.
Change and unpredictability are fashionable aspects of payments, but it’s important that the basics of quality, reliability and availability are retained as the foundations for the new style of corporate banking, doing justice to the famous Yves Saint Laurent quote: “Fashions fade, style is eternal.”
The pan-European scheme question is not just about a new payment type, but about a new business environment. That environment is increasingly global for both the bank and its customers. When considering any real-time payments decision, banks must be confident that every step along that journey is with long-term strategy in mind; any pan-European implementation must easily scale to expanding volumes and integrate with global cross-border payments schemes, providing the quality and reach of service that customers expect.
Related Blog Posts
What Will 2020 Bring for Payments in Latin America?
2019 was yet another year of payments disruption throughout the LATAM region. Thanks in large part to the proliferation of fintechs, Latin American banks and processors have been under immense pressure to modernize their offerings, while also gaining the agility to quickly bring new products to market.
Request for Payment and Other Real-Time Payments Trends That Will Shape 2020
In 2020, the conversation around real-time payments will increasingly be about what banks can do with real-time, as they move beyond setting up to support real-time payments schemes. New use cases will emerge – but there are a few main trends that are likely to shape the direction of real-time in the year ahead.
2020: The Year of (Near) Cashless Transactions?
Happy belated New Year and raise your hand if you make and/or follow New Year’s resolutions. I used to and then realized they were exercises in futility. But, over this past holiday, I thought I’d give the resolution game one more shot. This one was more a realistic goal than it was a resolution, but who can really tell the difference anyway!?! I decided to go cashless over the holidays, which can still be somewhat challenging for many in the US (though my friends in other countries are probably ridiculing me right now). I was traveling (to NYC and Florida) and wanted to pack as little as possible (in both my luggage and my wallet). I’m all about loyalty card points these days, hence the 2 back-to-back trips.
Three Merchant Payment Trends to Watch in 2020
In 2019, merchants everywhere were challenged by pressure from new entrants, the continued breakdown of traditional industry boundaries and growing customer preference for a digitally-led or digitally-influenced purchasing experience.
The Invisibility Cloak of Payments: What Are the Consequences?
If you could pick any superpower, what would you pick? Children often pick "invisibility.” Oh, the possibilities of being invisible! What fun! You can walk into a candy store and take all the candy you want, you can stay downstairs late with your parents and listen to what they’re saying, you can sneak out without anybody noticing… But when you think about it, there are also disadvantages that come with this superpower.
Looking Back at Money20/20 USA: Where Do We Go From Here?
Now that the dust has settled on another successful Money20/20 USA in Las Vegas, it allows for a moment of reflection on what some of the announcements and trends mean for the ever-changing financial industry. Discussions spanned a variety of topics, including the future of international and digital expansion of PSPs, how organizations developing cryptocurrency wallets plan to enter the payments space, and how challenger banks plan to revolutionize the banking experience. Inclusivity was a recurring theme throughout – and nowhere was this more evident than in the Rise Up program.
2020 Fraud Predictions: What to Expect Across the Globe as Cybercrime Evolves
Our payment experts take stock of the trends that shaped 2019 and make their predictions for where they see the industry heading in 2020.
I sat down with our own fraud experts, Marc Trepanier, principal fraud consultant for North America, and Giselle Lindley, principal fraud consultant for APAC, to get their thoughts on what we can expect in the year ahead around payments fraud.
Real-Time Payments Hits Its Stride in the U.S.
The recent announcement of FedNow in the U.S., the launch of cross-border services like SWIFT gpi, and multiple real-time payment systems including The Clearing House’s (TCH) RTP system and Zelle underline the fact that real-time payments are here to stay. The need to deliver real-time payment services to customers has never been more pressing for banks, credit unions, processors, acquirers and fintechs. However, the U.S. payments ecosystem – and its infrastructure – must keep pace with global markets to remain competitive, and interoperability between real-time payment systems will be key.
Deep Dive: Latin American Fintech Market (Part 2)
To support fintechs’ development and create a more inclusive financial system, governments across the Latin American region should adopt different regulations. Some good practices implemented in other countries, like the U.K. or Singapore, could also be adopted in Latin America, such as temporary exemptions on fintech authorizations on behalf of regulating entities, or the creation of temporary regulation sandboxes in which fintechs can operate, evaluate their business models and offer their innovative products in supervised environments.