The Next Stage of Real-Time Payments Evolution is Here
Fragmentation resulting from multiple Pan-European Immediate Payments schemes is a challenge, but solutions exist
We are facing a proliferation of Pan-EU instant payment services in Europe. Most industry players and experts are aware of the dangers of fragmentation and the reasons why this issue needs to be addressed. And even though the new schemes are pan-European, the problem lies in getting them all to communicate and connect with each other.
Financial institutions that are interested in expanding their business into other markets and regions must undertake rigorous analysis before any decision is taken, to understand which immediate payments service guarantees the highest reachability. In most cases, there is the need to join more than one immediate payments service to get maximum coverage.
However, identifying which service to join is just the tip of the iceberg; the next step requires conducting an analysis of the “rules of the game” for each service. This can be a real challenge; even though all Pan-EU instant services are compliant with the SCT Inst rulebook financial institutions should consider other aspects like local regulation, sanction screening, multiple currencies, and one of the most troublesome aspects - the liquidity layer. The liquidity layer is not covered by the rulebook, but instead is regulated by the different clearing and settlement mechanisms.
Liquidity in the Real-Time Era
Ensuring you have control of your liquidity in the real-time world is of paramount importance and is an essential element of implementing real-time payment solutions. There is a direct link between the fragmentation of Pan-EU instant services and the liquidity; in fact, most of these services require their own technical settlement account. Indeed, this absence of a centralized LQ position means that treasurers must spread the liquidity across several accounts, risking being able to achieve the RTGS minimum reserve requirements and making it near impossible to be compliant with the BASIL III intraday liquidity principles. If that wasn’t bad enough, the treasurer’s ‘bread and butter’ of generating interest on funds held, is hampered by having to place funds in multiple non-interest bearing accounts. But there is a solution…
TIPS, The ECB initiative – A Hero Solution
SEPA and SEPA Inst have many of the same characteristics, including fragmentation across their services. The difference is those ‘knights in shining armour’ – the European Central Bank. Sometimes mistakenly perceived to be more of a hindrance than a help, they have a clear strategy to dispel this reputation. This comes in the form of creating a solution that supports financial institutions, helping them be more efficient and competitive through offering new services based on the new real-time business model.
How can TIPS help?
TIPS is a new solution launching in November 2018 across Europe. This is incidentally exactly one year on from the SEPA Inst launch that coincided with Il Salone Dei Pagamenti in 2017. The key liquidity benefit is being able to concentrate all Technical Settlement accounts in one dedicated Target2 account named TIPS.
This enables treasurers to consolidate their liquidity, still be part and under the jurisdiction of Target 2, and be subject to the RTGS minimum reserve requirements. Another benefit is related to the nightmare of providing forecasts for 24/7/365 real-time payments because the scheme operates outside traditional working hours (night time, bank holidays, weekends). This poses a liquidity dilemma because it is difficult to reserve the right quantity of funds to settle immediate payments and invest the rest. This problem is reduced with TIPS because apart from the Target2 security settlement, there is nothing to settle when traditional Target2 is offline; a financial institution can simply reserve all their liquidity for TIPS in one consolidated account.
Consequently, fragmentation is reduced and gives the treasurer more leeway, whilst enabling them to still control limits, set CAPS and benefit from all the services TIPS provides. The key is to start implementing TIPS now so that you are prepared for the November launch. You can do this by using solutions that are already compatible with TIPS, which includes ACI’s UP Immediate Payments solution. It is important for innovative banks to ACT NOW, as it takes at least six months for integration to TIPS internally.
From adoption to innovation: Transitioning from an old legacy system which is heavily siloed
The recipe for success lies in finding the right ingredients for modernization. Any time we are faced by changes in regulation, it always seems frustratingly urgent - this could be due to specific deadlines internally or industry wide. We are also often under pressure because of limited budget or a fight for fund allocation from other parts of the business. This frequently results in decisions being taken with a short-term solution in mind – the infamous Elastoplast or Band-Aid solution, depending on your geography. A bank will often use their 40-year-old legacy system to solve the problem, to save time and reduce costs. However, this short-term strategy does not prepare the bank for the fast pace that real-time and payments generally is setting. Banks need to take a long-term view and invest in a solution that allows them to fulfil any internal request or market expectation now and in the future.
According to a new whitepaper ACI will launch in April in collaboration with KPMG, use of straight-through processing (STP) to streamline processes and minimize costs is one of the fundamental initiatives that financial institutions should undertake to decommission inefficient payment systems, reconcile disparate infrastructure, promote automation in back office processes and replace high unit-cost options such as checks and cash with efficient, low-cost real-time payments.
It is time for financial institutions to stand up for taking a long-term view on becoming more dynamic when new upgraded applications/solutions are needed. There is only one option to deal with this – a sustainable solution, able to be quickly integrated with banks’ legacy systems, allowing a gradual and progressive system modernization, breaking down silos that have characterized banks’ core systems for 40 years.
I accept that some banks chose a tactical implementation of real-time a few years ago because they were unsure of volumes and how much in demand real-time would be for their customers. However, we now know that customers want everything ‘NOW’ and that 40% of consumers and 74% of SMEs in Europe will actively switch banks if they aren’t offered real-time payments. Banks need to implement real-time payments strategically, so they offer the speed, convenience and innovation that their customers demand and this will also open-up new revenue streams through added services supplied by third-party providers (TPPs).
Find out more about the impact of immediate payments on financial institutions and intermediaries and what ACI can do to help organizations capitalize on the opportunities created by the new payments ecosystem.
Related Blog Posts
Instant Payments in Italy – And Beyond: Lessons from Il Salone dei Pagamenti
ACI was invited back to Il Salone dei Pagamenti – Italy’s premier payments event organized by the Italian Banking Association (ABI) – to participate in a panel, “SEPA Inst – the Future.” As expected, the session was packed with stats and advice for a more efficient roll out of instant payments – in Italy and beyond.
To Regulate Or Not To Regulate – Is That Thy Question?
Debates are healthy, and as someone who spent a little time during my college years dabbling around the edges of the speech and debate team, I can tell you it’s something that I personally relish. A chance to really talk through the pros and cons of an argument and lay out the bare facts… and then be judged based not only on those facts, but on the presentation and power of persuasion—sign me up!
Request for Pay – What Does It Mean For Financial Institutions?
What do banks – one with $60B+ in assets, one a mid-size regional bank, and one, a small innovative credit union – have in common with payment networks and the ‘Big 4’ consulting firms? They were all part of the first ACI #PaymentsForBreakfast event in North America! The theme was real-time payments, but the focus was more specifically on Request for Pay.
Why Open Banking Might Need to Rely on a Magic Illusion of 24x7 Availability
The adage “the more things change, the more they stay the same” appears to ring true when applied to the early phases of the evolution of open banking (or open payments). Especially when you contrast it with the early days of ATM withdrawals; particularly those made in the dead of night so you could pay cash for your after-party greasy feast.
Sibos Preview: The Five Trends Transforming Real-Time Payments
Real-time is now a reality, with more than 30 schemes live around the world. And real-time is in the spotlight as banks and financial service providers make their way to Sydney for Sibos 2018. What better time to look ahead at the key trends that are going to shape the ongoing development of real-time payments.
Winners and Losers in the Regulation Vs Competition Debate? How About New Business Models?
As Summer has abruptly turned to Fall, I have found myself daydreaming of a European vacation (and yes, I realize it’s Fall there too… or rather, Autumn). Maybe it’s the Instagram feed full of friends on a summer sojourn to Italy, France, or Germany, or the constant barrage of Premier League kickoff commercials on the NBC Networks (Let’s Go Gunners!), but yesterday it was something else entirely that had me drifting off into a memory-induced Nutella-crepe state of euphoria.
API Management: The Reason Digital Open Banking Can Fly
When it comes to thinking about the different roles that an API Manager can play for an organization, I personally think that an airport provides the perfect analogy. The customer is the passenger, the third-party organizations using a bank’s APIs are the airlines and the airport itself is the bank. I also think this analogy helps to visualize the variety of API management capabilities – including the role of an API gateway.
The Mexican Fintech Revolution – ¿Qué onda in Open Banking?
Mexico has joined an elite group of nations, being amongst the first to pass open banking regulations. Specifically designed to open up its financial services and technology sector, the so-called ‘Fintech Law’ appears to have taken notes from PSD2, UK Open Banking, Singapore’s ‘organic’ approach, and others – and balances these against Mexico’s unique context and aims.
ACI’s Lu Zurawski, one of the industry's foremost open payments experts, and Sonia Gomez, a Latin America payments authority, discuss this balancing act; including the drivers, the regulation and the potential benefits.
Working Up An Appetite for APIs in Australia
This week ACI hosted the latest installment of our #paymentsforbreakfast forums in Australia, with the early birds catching the open banking worm in both Sydney and Melbourne.
Given the similarities between the Australian and UK open banking movements, we enticed ACI’s UK-based Lu Zurawski (Solutions Practice Lead - Retail Banking) to Australia to share his learnings from being heavily involved in the UK Open Banking working group.
APIs and Cash Management (Harnessing the Hammer, Part 2)
In my last blog post, we talked about the hammer and the nail; the hammer in this case being open APIs, and the nail being the market need to adapt to changes in customer behavior and expectations from our commercial market. We laid out why the US is in a different position when it comes to open APIs—it has to do entirely with the regulatory environment, which is allowing us to start with the largest revenue opportunity first. Finally, we challenged you, the reader, on how you can begin on your journey. And that is where we are going to pick things up. What steps can you take today, and what use cases can you explore as we start getting our hands dirty?