Real-Time Payments Will be Europe’s Most Dominant Payments System – Are You Ready to Realize the Full Value?
Since the launch of the SCT Inst rulebook in November 2017, many more banks are live and offering real-time payments to their customers, with most of the rest committed to 2018. The buzzword at the recent ECB #TIPSapp Event in Frankfurt was ‘Interoperability,’ or as my friend José Beltrán from STET would say, ‘Reachability.’ No-one expressed this more clearly on February 6th than Javier Santamaria, President of the European Payments Council, when he reiterated his message from Il Salone Dei Pagamenti, the day after the SEPA launch; "We have launched the Pan-EU scheme, now it is up to you in the audience and beyond to take advantage of it and make it work."
With the European Central Bank’s new challenger service, Target Instant Payments Scheme (TIPS), going live in November 2018, it is looking like the drive for interoperability is fast becoming a reality rather than an expectation. However, the industry is keen to understand more about how TIPS can help alleviate the risk of fragmentation within the Pan-EU Instant Payment region.
The fear is that with so many local and Pan-European schemes live, there could be a risk of them not talking to each other, exacerbated by the fact that most of the individual schemes require a local settlement account. From a treasury perspective, fragmentation of the liquidity – and that liquidity being regulated by different standards – culminates in a nightmarish difficulty in keeping the bank’s liquidity position.
Keeping liquidity management front and centre
Last but by no means least, all these technical settlement accounts are outside of the RTGS (real-time gross settlement) jurisdiction, and even though it is possible to fund/defund them during the RTGS open hours, it is not possible to have the liquidity outside of the RTGS system. This causes a loss of remuneration and problems with the reserve requirements. The solution that TIPS offers alleviates fragmentation and enables the treasurer to forward the RTGS liquidity to TIPS; therefore, by having one central point, it mitigates the risk of running out of liquidity. This avoids transactions being declined, which is a reputational risk that may lead to customers switching to more reliable competitors. If that wasn’t serious enough, banks also risk a heavy fine from the regulator, which may have the catastrophic consequence of the revocation of the bank’s licence.
With the TIPS initiative, the ECB is facilitating the closure of the local technical settlement accounts in order to concentrate the settlement layer in one single account in a central bank. This will be Euro-based at the outset, with multiple currencies due to be rolled out in the second phase.
In short, TIPS allows financial institutions to mitigate the liquidity risk, concentrate their liquidity in one single point – the TIPS DCA account – whilst still being a part of the RTGS system and adhering to the strict reserve requirements. It is a win-win scenario for treasurers and, as you and I know, it is the hero treasurers who can find that fine balance of keeping just enough back to cover demand and investing the rest, creating a clear revenue stream.
Achieving the holy grail: Interoperability
However, back to the key aspiration of ‘Interoperability’ and how TIPS will have an impact. Potentially every owner of a Target 2 account can open a TIPS DCA account and it is no coincidence that most banks in Europe have one. Also, there are options for non-banks to connect to a Target 2 account, meaning an expansion into the world of retail, which is reflective of how the European payment ecosystem is changing.
ACI recognized for Interoperability of solution
Whilst a lot of mobile prototype applications were demonstrated at the ECB’s #TIPSapp Challenge Event, and all of them were well designed to satisfy the client requirements for TIPS integration, it was ACI that addressed a crucial point – it is all very well having a slick mobile app to connect to TIPS, but without a solution that enables you to connect seamlessly to the other schemes (RT1, STET and local schemes), you are always going to lose in the interoperability stakes. In fact, when the ECB asked what makes the ACI solution stand out, 48% of the 100+ voting audience noted interoperability and the convenience it brings.
A salute to the ECB and their stewardship for innovation for real-time payments in Europe
It was exciting to see the ECB TIPS team bringing the solution providers and financial institutions together at this event to work on a common objective; the success of the TIPS project and the realization of European reachability.
I would like to thank the ECB for hosting this event, and I encourage financial institutions to ACT NOW on getting to grips with the complexities of real-time payments. The move toward real-time payments is global and adoption is accelerating. Existing solutions are expanding their reach and services, while new solutions are continuously coming to market. Regulators are throwing their weight behind real-time payments, non-bank competitors are eagerly embracing it, and consumers are candidly demanding it. And a quick hat tip to ACI’s pre-packed and pre-tested cloud solution– every size of financial institution can exploit the opportunities it offers and guarantee speed to market. If banks and financial institutions don’t move quickly, then they risk losing more than payment volumes; they risk losing their customers.
Related Blog Posts
Could COVID-19 Be India’s Cashless Catalyst?
India’s push towards a digital economy has accelerated over the years, with a supportive regulatory environment, home-grown technologies and innovation around digital infrastructure improving “last mile” connectivity to the remote towns and rural areas of the country. While the “Digital India” drive has been consistent, the COVID-19 pandemic has brought out the true value of digitization for businesses and consumers alike. It is a watershed moment and has fast-tracked the pace of digital adoption, particularly for payments, which now plays a critical role in economic recovery.
Only One-Third of Major Fuel Merchants Have Fully Implemented EMV and 20 Percent are Still in the Planning Stage
Earlier this year, we blogged about the issue of EMV implementation in the U.S. fuel sector and the fraud issues fuel merchants can expect to see if they’re not ready by the extended April 2021 deadline.
Omni-Commerce Is Heating Up the Merchant Token Revolution
Merchants around the world have embraced the wisdom of keeping sensitive customer data (such as card numbers) out of their own environments, with tokens emerging as the tool of choice to bridge the gap. Merchant functions — including reservations, returns, reporting, rewards, research, reconciliation and more — have typically required access to sensitive data, but a series of high-profile breaches has highlighted the need to store card numbers in tightly secured safe harbors.
Are Alternative Payment Methods the Future of Fuel and C-Store Payments?
Card payments are still king in many sectors, including fuel and convenience, where according to Mercator Advisory Group, 57 percent of U.S. drivers currently use a credit or debit card to pay. However, the rising adoption and associated benefits of mobile and other alternative payment methods (APMs) in many other sectors have put the topic of APMs on the radars of fuel merchants.
Will COVID-19 Accelerate Friction-Free Payments in the Fuel Sector?
Today’s consumers expect easier and more frictionless ways to pay. The upshot for merchants is that consumers who do receive convenient, friction-free experiences tend to spend more and show greater loyalty.
COVID-19: Global eCommerce Sales are likely to rise beyond the crisis and businesses need to prepare accordingly
Since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, ACI has published a monthly Covid-19 eCommerce Tracker, analyzing global eCommerce sales, consumer purchasing behaviors and fraud trends. Katrin Boettger spoke with ACI’s Debbie Guerra, executive vice president at ACI, about the latest eCommerce trends and the long-term changes the pandemic may bring for consumers and merchants.
The Co-op U.K.: In with the New Does Not Mean Out with the Old
I had the pleasure on May 19 to discuss The Co-operative Group’s consumer payments strategy with Paul Fletcher, Co-op’s Head of Payments.
The Co-operative Group is a compelling case study within the U.K.’s convenience grocery sector; steeped in history and tradition, with a culture that demonstrates a real heartfelt pride in its mutual ownership origins. A nod to the past now seems to be a trend among big businesses, as they remind customers of their (usually) long-ago establishments and “origin stories.” But in the case of Co-op, it really does mean something, and it influences everything they do — payments included.
Move Over EMV – Meet the Real Protectors of Fuel Pump Payments
There’s much more than EMV for fuel merchants to consider when it comes to blocking fraudsters. Learn why P2PE and tokenization are the data security duo fuel merchants need to block fraud and satisfy genuine customers.
The EMV Deadline Has Been Extended for U.S. Fuel Merchants – Now What?
U.S. fuel stations were originally supposed to be EMV-compliant by October 2017, but due to complications and costs at the time, the deadline for EMV at the pump was extended for three years – and it has now been pushed out further to April 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Are Chargebacks Making a Comeback for U.S. Fuel Merchants?
With the planned EMV implementation date looming for U.S. fuel merchants, we’ll be spending some time ahead of the October 2020 deadline looking at the fraud issues affecting fuel merchants and how these might change through the final quarter of this year.