Immediate Payments Require New Business Models First, IT Solutions Can Come Later
Hungary is probably not the first country that comes to mind when talking about fintech hotspots and innovation hubs. However, the country is very much at the forefront when it comes to banking innovation in Europe. In late 2017, I had the privilege to speak at the annual Fintech Innovation Conference in Budapest. Organized by Privatbanker.hu, this was a great opportunity to meet not only Hungarian experts, but finance professionals and industry stakeholders from across the continent.
Immediate Payments was, unsurprisingly, one of the hot topics in payments last year. In 2019, Hungary will launch its own domestic IP scheme. Participation is mandatory for all banks in Hungary; therefore, preparing for the launch of this scheme is on top of the agenda for most financial institutions, and the topic dominated many of the event presentations and individual discussions I had.
One of the main takeaways for me was the importance of explaining and highlighting the business case for Instant Payments (IP).
A key leader from one of the most important Banks in Central and Eastern Europe communicated his views in a refreshingly frank way when he asked me: “Dome, we are about to launch IP in our country. We know it is a Central Bank decision, but we still don’t see business opportunities in relation to the new services. Where is the business case? Are we sure our clients are interested in Instant Payments?”
His question made me realize that some banks seem to be missing a crucial part of the project. While much of the debate focused around the best IT solutions, it is important to point out that IP is a business and organizational model first. The IT solutions come later, and should be tailored to meet the new dynamic IP business model.
I have worked in the banking sector for close to 25 years, including serving as Head of International Payment Applications at one of the key EU banking groups. As such, I understand that developing an in-house solution based purely on IT, without taking into consideration all aspects of the proposition that are necessary for a new evolution in payments, is tantamount to committing to failure almost straight ‘out of the gate.’ Just to give you an example, 15 of the 40 initial banks involved in the first window of the EBA RT1 IP service decided to step away and defer their ‘go live date.’ It is important to understand why these banks felt the need to postpone the project. The answer to this question is simple - a partial or complete underestimation of the cash and liquidity aspects, ignoring the fact that IP is not just a new payment typology, but, as noted, an organizational model of the bank that should evolve as a bank evolves too.
At ACI, we are investing a lot of time and energy into research aimed at understanding customer demand for IP from consumers, small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs), corporates and even governments. This year, we conducted surveys among consumers and SMEs in the US and Europe into the demand for real-time payments and the results are conclusive globally: many consumers are ready to switch banks if their existing provider does not offer Instant Payments. In Hungary, for example, 69 percent of consumers will consider switching banks for the offer of real-time payments.1
Sharing and analyzing data that supports the business case for Instant Payments is a key part of our commitment to partners, clients and prospects.
The message delivered during the conference by the Deputy State Secretary for Financial Policy at the Ministry for National Economy, Mr. László Balogh, was probably the most interesting and open: “Banks should invest in technology and innovative services to meet consumers’ expectations, in compliance with new regulations around data protection and money laundering. This should lead to significant cost efficiency; however, this benefit should be shared between service providers and consumers.”
Going forward, I hope that banks will start looking at the business case and understand that real-time payments are not just an IT investment. In Hungary, several PSPs are already active and will soon be able to offer competitive services. They are poised to take clients from more traditional financial service providers and we expect to see similar developments in other countries where IP is already firmly established. Without a dynamic solution that allows a financial institution to offer new services quickly, tailored for specific client typologies and using an Open API approach, traditional banks will experience difficulties. Judging by the lack of awareness I saw at this event, the list of banks could be long. However, the good news is that it isn’t too late to turn things around. If banks start looking at IP as more than just an IT project, and develop long-term business cases now, they will be able to rise to the challenge and compete in this brave new payments world.
Learn more about real-time consumer demand and market drivers in both the U.S. and Europe.
1 All figures, unless otherwise stated, are from YouGov Plc. Total sample size was 1,000 adults. Fieldwork was undertaken between May 31st - June 5th, 2017. The survey was carried out online.
Related Blog Posts
Utilities: It’s Time to Put Your Arrears Behind You
As the economic crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic left many utilities customers financially insecure and unable to pay their bills, states across the country issued unprecedented moratoriums on utility shutoffs. But, as the pandemic continues, many states are beginning to lift those moratoriums, leaving customers responsible for paying back the $40+ billion in debt they owe to their utilities billers.
How to Resolve Delayed Mail Issues with Digital Payments
In light of the pandemic, the United States Postal Service (USPS) has been facing its own crisis. In late December 2020, only 38 percent of non-local first-class mail arrived on time, compared with 92 percent during the same time period in 2019. While mail delays may be considered a minor inconvenience for some consumers who receive late-arriving packages, there can be serious implications for those who rely on traditional mail to receive and pay their bills each month.
Data Security Is Table Stakes for Bill Payment – Communication Can Be the Competitive Differentiator
More than 80 percent of consumers are at least somewhat concerned about online identity theft, and nearly half are concerned about the safety of their personal information when paying online, according to the latest ACI Speedpay Pulse. But, despite these concerns, consumers have embraced the convenience that digital technology brings to their daily lives. Fortunately, these new digital experiences have been positive and are driving consumer confidence in data security: nearly half of those surveyed believe their data is safer than it was five years ago.
Billing Experts Predict Consumers Will Be Driving Force Behind Payments Industry Changes in 2021
As we near the end of 2020, the pandemic and its resulting economic fallout continue to wreak havoc: COVID-19 cases are increasing, raising concerns about an economic recession and instilling uncertainty among consumers about their financial security. In fact, 15 percent of consumers who responded to a recent ACI Speedpay Pulse survey reported that the pandemic was a direct factor in missing a bill payment. And of those consumers who currently have past-due payments, more than a third believe it will take them at least six months to catch up on late bills.
Customer Experience: A Key Ingredient for Biller Success
Today’s consumers are looking for fast and seamless experiences across the board, including when it comes to making bill payments. Understandably, slow and inconvenient experiences lead to lost loyalty and likely attrition – especially with consumers paying up to 10 bills per month, according to recent findings from the ACI Speedpay Pulse.
Filling the Gaps: How Higher Ed Institutions Can Put Money Back into Their Budgets
At a time when budgets at colleges and universities are tighter than a snare drum, where can schools turn to find the funds for their finance and IT departments? Sure, donors and alums may be tempting sources, but one answer to this funding issue is actually quite simple:
How Billers Can Adapt to a Changing Payments Security Landscape
More and more consumers are adopting digital channels like websites and mobile apps to pay their bills; but at the same time, hackers are becoming more sophisticated and cyberattacks are increasing in frequency. In fact, nearly 20 percent of consumers have fallen victim to online identity theft, according to our most recent ACI Speedpay Pulse, pointing to an opportunity for billers to up the ante when it comes to security measures.
Cut Your Losses – It’s Time to Digitize Medical Loss Ratio Rebate Payments
The deadline to issue medical loss ratio (MLR) rebates for 2020 is next week, yet many health insurers are meeting the requirement by sending paper checks in the mail. Meanwhile, only seven percent of health care premium payments are paid by check, according to the 2020 ACI Speedpay Pulse survey on billing and payment preferences. Policyholders receiving these checks may not understand why they are receiving them – if they even open the envelope in the first place.
Recurring Success: Exploring Subscription Payment Trends
When you think of recurring monthly expenses, there are certain obvious bills that come to mind: mortgage or rent, utilities and phone bill, among others. But today, monthly recurring expenses increasingly include things like online streaming services (music and entertainment), meal kits, pet treats, video games and clothing. It seems there’s a subscription service for everything these days — and consumers are taking full advantage.
Age Matters: Generational Preferences in Bill Payments
Digitalization has taken the mainstage in the payments industry due to changing consumer preferences and now, in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, necessity. According to the 2020 ACI Speedpay Pulse report, one in four consumers has increased their usage of the biller’s website to pay bills, while one in five has decreased the number of payments they send by mail or make in person at a physical location. In addition, more consumers prefer digital statements (48.2%) to paper statements (25%), while around a quarter prefer to receive both digital and paper (26.8%).