Immediate Payments Require New Business Models First, IT Solutions Can Come Later
Hungary is probably not the first country that comes to mind when talking about fintech hotspots and innovation hubs. However, the country is very much at the forefront when it comes to banking innovation in Europe. In late 2017, I had the privilege to speak at the annual Fintech Innovation Conference in Budapest. Organized by Privatbanker.hu, this was a great opportunity to meet not only Hungarian experts, but finance professionals and industry stakeholders from across the continent.
Immediate Payments was, unsurprisingly, one of the hot topics in payments last year. In 2019, Hungary will launch its own domestic IP scheme. Participation is mandatory for all banks in Hungary; therefore, preparing for the launch of this scheme is on top of the agenda for most financial institutions, and the topic dominated many of the event presentations and individual discussions I had.
One of the main takeaways for me was the importance of explaining and highlighting the business case for Instant Payments (IP).
A key leader from one of the most important Banks in Central and Eastern Europe communicated his views in a refreshingly frank way when he asked me: “Dome, we are about to launch IP in our country. We know it is a Central Bank decision, but we still don’t see business opportunities in relation to the new services. Where is the business case? Are we sure our clients are interested in Instant Payments?”
His question made me realize that some banks seem to be missing a crucial part of the project. While much of the debate focused around the best IT solutions, it is important to point out that IP is a business and organizational model first. The IT solutions come later, and should be tailored to meet the new dynamic IP business model.
I have worked in the banking sector for close to 25 years, including serving as Head of International Payment Applications at one of the key EU banking groups. As such, I understand that developing an in-house solution based purely on IT, without taking into consideration all aspects of the proposition that are necessary for a new evolution in payments, is tantamount to committing to failure almost straight ‘out of the gate.’ Just to give you an example, 15 of the 40 initial banks involved in the first window of the EBA RT1 IP service decided to step away and defer their ‘go live date.’ It is important to understand why these banks felt the need to postpone the project. The answer to this question is simple - a partial or complete underestimation of the cash and liquidity aspects, ignoring the fact that IP is not just a new payment typology, but, as noted, an organizational model of the bank that should evolve as a bank evolves too.
At ACI, we are investing a lot of time and energy into research aimed at understanding customer demand for IP from consumers, small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs), corporates and even governments. This year, we conducted surveys among consumers and SMEs in the US and Europe into the demand for real-time payments and the results are conclusive globally: many consumers are ready to switch banks if their existing provider does not offer Instant Payments. In Hungary, for example, 69 percent of consumers will consider switching banks for the offer of real-time payments.1
Sharing and analyzing data that supports the business case for Instant Payments is a key part of our commitment to partners, clients and prospects.
The message delivered during the conference by the Deputy State Secretary for Financial Policy at the Ministry for National Economy, Mr. László Balogh, was probably the most interesting and open: “Banks should invest in technology and innovative services to meet consumers’ expectations, in compliance with new regulations around data protection and money laundering. This should lead to significant cost efficiency; however, this benefit should be shared between service providers and consumers.”
Going forward, I hope that banks will start looking at the business case and understand that real-time payments are not just an IT investment. In Hungary, several PSPs are already active and will soon be able to offer competitive services. They are poised to take clients from more traditional financial service providers and we expect to see similar developments in other countries where IP is already firmly established. Without a dynamic solution that allows a financial institution to offer new services quickly, tailored for specific client typologies and using an Open API approach, traditional banks will experience difficulties. Judging by the lack of awareness I saw at this event, the list of banks could be long. However, the good news is that it isn’t too late to turn things around. If banks start looking at IP as more than just an IT project, and develop long-term business cases now, they will be able to rise to the challenge and compete in this brave new payments world.
Learn more about real-time consumer demand and market drivers in both the U.S. and Europe.
1 All figures, unless otherwise stated, are from YouGov Plc. Total sample size was 1,000 adults. Fieldwork was undertaken between May 31st - June 5th, 2017. The survey was carried out online.
Related Blog Posts
Securely Growing Online Sales in 2018: An Australian Perspective
Back in November 2017, I participated in a panel discussion for NORA (National Online Retail Association), where I looked at fraud trends in Australia over the previous holiday shopping season and made predictions to help retailers prepare. Now looking back, I am sorry to say that my predictions were painfully accurate.
When Is Processing Payments in The Cloud More Secure?
Back when I started my career, “Jessie’s Girl” by Australian rocker Rick Springfield topped the charts, the federal funds rate was 20 percent and most organizations were reliant upon one or more mainframe computers that were hosted in an internal “computer room.”
More than Half: the Story of Cyber-Attacks and Global Organizations in 2017
Three words. It might not seem enough to cause a rethink of your 2018 cyber-security strategy, but it should. Why? Because according to the latest Forrester report, “Top Cybersecurity Threats for Retailers in 2018,” attackers breached more than half of all global enterprises in 2017.
More. Than. Half.
The Seasons Are Changing (And So Are Fraud and Regulations)
If you smell the air, you can sense the seasons changing; a little crispy cold moving in suddenly, the leaves are reddening and the winds of Faster Payments and PSD2 are kicking up. Smooth transition, right? So, yeah, seasons change, and so do regulatory regimes. In the US, we’ve been largely left to our own discretions about how to run our fraud shops, with some regulatory oversight regarding disputes handling. Historically, financial institution processes around authentication and fraud monitoring (including analytics and strategy) could be anything or nothing, depending on an institution’s risk appetite. Like the seasons, this might be in transition.
Learning Lessons from Large Scale Breaches
At this point, there’s no ignoring it: our financial security is compromised daily. And no doubt, many reading this wouldn’t hesitate to recount all the breaches they have been a part of as consumers; merchant breaches in which replacement cards forced you to update your linked accounts, or data compromises where personal information was stolen and identity theft protection was provided, forcing you to consider freezing new credit originations.
What Australia's $639M Cnp Fraud Problem Means for Retailers
In my role at ACI Worldwide, my fellow fraud consultants and I constantly share information from all corners of the globe. One recent bit of intelligence that immediately caught my eye, and I shared with colleagues across the world, was the staggering cost of card-not-present (CNP) fraud here in Australia.
CNP fraud accounts for 78% of all payments-related fraud in Australia. And to say it is a challenge for retailers—and the industry as a whole—is a vast understatement. With the astounding growth in eCommerce sales, this is not a problem in decline; it is rising aggressively and shows no signs of abating.
PSD2 Carries over to the U.S. – Thanks to the Phone in Your Hand
Let me ask you a favor. Could you put down your phone for just a minute? Unless, of course, you’re reading this on your mobile device.
It can be an uphill battle asking someone to put down their phone these days. I have a tween, so I know the struggle! One of the reasons we’re so reticent to do so is the sheer power contained within these devices. At this point, it controls the music, the temperature, the locks and even the lighting in your home, and that’s not even touching on its entertainment value, or its capabilities as a payment device. The device, in its present form, has been around for ten years now, and in 2017, it’s safe to say there’s no going back.
Filtering the Fraudster
In our new Insight Paper, we focus on how merchants can build an effective fraud filter for their sales funnel – one that is not over-restrictive, leads to genuine sales being accepted, and prevents genuine fraud. Get the balance right and merchants stand to improve their checkout conversion rates and boost their bottom line.
Stop Fraud… or Increase Conversion Rates? with a Fine-Tuned Fraud Engine, Merchants Can Do Both
Preventing fraud and driving high conversion rates are universally important objectives for merchants – but many struggle to adequately balance these two demands. They either employ aggressive fraud prevention strategies to minimize fraud losses, or conversely, reduce checks in order to prevent false positives, improve customer experience and ensure sales targets are met. Neither exclusive approach works in the long run; focusing on only one will prove costly on multiple fronts.
Eta Transact: Time to Break Out… and Cross Borders to Reach New Customers
It’s before lunch on day one of ETA Transact17 in Las Vegas; exhibitors are still putting the finishing touches on their stands in the main hall, so it’s the perfect opportunity to sit in on some of the breakout sessions, part of the educational program put on by the Electronic Transactions Association. And ‘breakout session’ seems particularly apt in this case, as panelists from ACI Worldwide, Planet Payment, and arvato launch into a discussion on how merchants and payment providers can ‘break out’ of their domestic markets and take advantage of the huge opportunity in cross-border eCommerce.