How Central Infrastructures Provide a Foundation for Real-Time Growth
Almost the world over, societies have been steadily trending away from cash over the last decade – a process that has been rapidly accelerated in recent months as the COVID-19 pandemic has restricted movement and social contact.
While shiny new fintechs grab the headlines with innovative digital replacements for cash, there’s no escaping the fact that it is a country’s central infrastructure (CI) that does much of the heavy lifting.
Indeed, as governments deliver on their societal responsibilities to extend financial inclusion, and their economic responsibilities to promote growth by helping money flow between people and businesses, there are now more centrally driven real-time payments initiatives in the world than ever before.
This has pushed us towards the emergence of widespread real-time payments adoption, as seen in our recent Prime Time for Real-Time Payments Report, and countries without a real-time CI know that they need one: the question is how? It’s no small task to upgrade a country’s central payments infrastructure and it’s a process fraught with complications. Certainly, countries can learn from those with mature real-time capabilities, but there isn’t a single roadmap for success. And these mature countries are themselves finding that real-time success breeds a host of new challenges, as the nature of demand changes and its velocity increases.
Stability through sovereignty?
Aside from the high-level societal and economic benefits already noted, sovereignty is another major driver prompting governments to create real-time-enabled CIs.
Adoption has soared in countries and regions with mature and open real-time capabilities, as the utility and convenience of real-time payments has been proven. This success has allowed governments to wrest control of a key economic function from private interests with potentially monopolistic tendencies.
This success, however, has also given rise to new tensions that raise familiar challenges to the sovereignty of these systems. Governments rightly need to assess their ability to protect national interests, including payment processing and data handling. As citizens’ expectations change, demand is growing for yet more capabilities that further shape real-time payments around their day-to-day lives. These “overlay services,” created by non-governmental actors, raise questions around how to govern connectivity to the underlying CI in a way that boosts innovation, while guarding against the risks of a small handful of – usually – foreign players coming in to dominate the space.
These are not mere technical questions. They strike to the heart of driving liquidity and stability in the economy for the national good.
Learning from the experiences of mature real-time CIs
Embracing real-time within CIs also means being prepared to handle the resulting demands that come with it. Experience around the world shows that people want more specific services related to real-time, such as Request to Pay (RtP) digital overlay services, which create competitive environments in what have traditionally been non-competitive, government-owned spaces. Moreover, commercial banking interests are also coming around to the benefits of these services, driving further competition between banks and intermediaries.
This has led to growing and unexpected demand for further regulation on how these spaces are governed, and to re-assert the sovereign interests of a nation’s economy and its citizens.
Countries with a less developed infrastructure can use the growing pains of these established real-time CIs as an example for their own payments modernization initiatives. They can anticipate these future challenges and plan or regulate for them now, creating iterative roadmaps that learn from those that have gone before them to create adaptable and interoperable infrastructures. In this way, they move in the right direction, at the right speed – without over (or under) investing.
Changes in regulation are often linked to these initiatives – for example, a government might relax rules for how a certain sort of company can get a banking licence or clearance for payment processing and connecting to a CI. But policy, encouragement and persuasive “nudges” can also be used to accelerate adoption. For example, if a government’s main priority is, say, financial inclusion or to fight corruption, then it should ensure that citizens have easy access to new services like online banking, digital benefits payments and payroll loans.
From the outset, these governments have an opportunity to provide clear frameworks that inform the wider payments ecosystem how they can integrate into the new systems in pursuit of those policy objectives. These frameworks and schemes should be geared towards prioritizing the use of efficient CI components, increasing flow and liquidity and ensuring no one player can dominate the space and adversely impact stability.
A big challenge, worth tackling
Whatever stage of development a CI has reached, it still poses a challenge for national infrastructure providers, but at the same time they offer appealing outcomes that make these projects worth tackling. The improvement of central infrastructure is a serious commitment, which can take place over five to ten years, but the benefits to the economy and its citizens will endure for decades.
Discover more about what the growth of real-time payments means for the future of your national payments network in our eBook: Building the Foundations of a Real-Time World
Related Blog Posts
SCA: How PSPs Can Help Merchants Stay One Step Ahead
The main objective of PSD2’s Strong Customer Authentication (SCA) is to protect customers and reduce fraud by introducing new measures that ensure that customer-initiated transactions are being made by the genuine cardholder.
The EMV Deadline Has Been Extended for U.S. Fuel Merchants – Now What?
U.S. fuel stations were originally supposed to be EMV-compliant by October 2017, but due to complications and costs at the time, the deadline for EMV at the pump was extended for three years – and it has now been pushed out further to April 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Merchant Fraud in the Age of COVID-19: We Need to Prepare Ourselves for a “Tidal Wave” of Attacks
With millions of consumers around the world self-quarantining at home, online shopping for goods, services and entertainment has become the new normal for many. A recent analysis of our own data has shown that average transaction volumes in the retail sector in March rose 74 percent compared to the same period last year.
Global Fraud Landscape Evolving Quicker Than Ever – What Banks Need to Know
In the fraud prevention and cybercrime world, we often talk about fraudsters as the ultimate opportunists – looking for any weakness in a system that can be exploited. In recent years, as technological systems have advanced, fraudsters have increasingly turned to ”social engineering” to achieve their goals. Basically, hacking the person rather than hacking the system, as humans become the weakest link in the chain.
Predicciones de fraude para el 2020: Qué esperar con la rápida evolución del panorama de pagos en América Latina
La industria de pagos en América Latina está experimentando diversos cambios en varios segmentos a medida que la población de la región está cada vez más bancarizada y comienza a usar pagos electrónicos. Aunque el efectivo sigue siendo la forma de pago dominante, los gobiernos han impulsado los pagos electrónicos a través de la regulación. Esto ha asegurado que la aceptación y el crecimiento del pago con tarjeta hayan aumentado constantemente, han aparecido bancos digitales en diferentes países y el comercio electrónico ha aumentado significativamente.
Previsões para fraudes em 2020: O que esperar com o cenário de pagamentos em rápida evolução na América Latina
As violações de dados que envolvem dados de pagamento dobraram no ano passado por várias razões - falta de inovação em segurança, prioridades corporativas equivocadas e fraquezas nos portais de desenvolvedores, para citar alguns.
9 Holiday Preparedness Tips to Stay Protected from Fraud in 2019
The hustle and bustle of the holiday season often makes it difficult to prioritize consumer safety, especially when it comes to eCommerce and mobile devices. But with the growing threat of identity theft and other security concerns, it’s more important than ever to stay on top of consumer protection. After all, brand reputation and trust can take years to build, but all can be lost in a matter of minutes.
How to Survive Black Friday and Cyber Monday… and Provide a Great Consumer Experience
As Black Friday and Cyber Monday approach, shoppers and merchants alike await amazing deals and a welcome boost in sales, respectively. I took a moment to speak with two of ACI’s merchant payments and fraud experts, Andrew Marshman (merchant payments lead, Europe) and Erika Dietrich (VP, Global Fraud Prevention Risk Services) about what merchants need to know as they head forth into one of the biggest shopping seasons of the year.
Strong Customer Authentication in Australia: Reducing CNP Fraud and Streamlining eCommerce Payments
Minimizing fraud without harming the customer experience can be done – using the right tools
In 2017-18, card-not-present (CNP) fraud cost Australian eCommerce AUD $478 million and accounted for some 85 percent of all fraud on Australian-issued cards1. In 2016, CNP fraud in Europe represented 70% of all card fraud2. Seriously uncomfortable numbers.
2020 Fraud Predictions: What to Expect Across the Globe as Cybercrime Evolves
Our payment experts take stock of the trends that shaped 2019 and make their predictions for where they see the industry heading in 2020.
I sat down with our own fraud experts, Marc Trepanier, principal fraud consultant for North America, and Giselle Lindley, principal fraud consultant for APAC, to get their thoughts on what we can expect in the year ahead around payments fraud.