How Can European Banks Meet the ISO 20022 Migration Deadlines for TARGET2 and SWIFT?
First published in 2004 – and already broadly used in some quarters – ISO 20022 is rapidly set to become the de facto standard for financial messaging around the world, replacing MT messages.
For financial institutions, the impact of this will be significant. ISO 20022 will facilitate real-time payments and better interoperability, improving the quality and structure of financial messages and providing rich data with each transaction. In turn, this will enable everything from enhanced analytics to automated invoice reconciliation, delivering an enhanced experience for end customers.
Looking purely at the benefits, you might wonder why more financial institutions haven’t rushed to adopt ISO 20022 messaging. In reality, readying an internal payments engine to receive, process and send rich ISO messages can be complicated by legacy infrastructure, conflicting priorities, and strained resources –which goes some way to explaining why more haven’t already acted to make their payments engines compliant and able to capitalize on the rich data.
Unfortunately, this slow pace of adoption can’t continue – and particularly not in Europe, where Real-Time Gross Settlement (RTGS) systems under the control of the European Central Bank (ECB) and Euro Banking Association (EBA) have to contend with rapidly approaching ISO 20022 deadlines.
As deadlines loom, European banks must act
For those transacting through TARGET2 and EURO1/STEP1, the current deadline to be able to receive, process and send ISO 20022 messages is November 2021 (even with SWIFT's most recent push to November 2022). While this may seem a while off yet, the harsh reality is that the process of readying for ISO 20022 is often long-winded, resource-intensive and technically challenging. And European banks are by no means the only ones facing this pressure.
SWIFT has also mandated that all financial institutions processing SWIFT messages must be able to receive and process ISO 20022 messages. Although SWIFT has extended the timeline for the ISO 20022 start point by one year to November 2022, "the end date to enable full ISO 20022 for cross-border payments remains as originally planned, November 2025." Certain financial institutions with high levels of intermediary business in correspondent banking chains may also be required to send ISO 20022 messages, based on received ISO 20022 payments.
So, whether a bank is transacting via EURO1/STEP1, TARGET2, processing SWIFT messages, or both, they’ll need to be ready ahead of the deadlines. And while SWIFT will offer a transition period of interoperability supported by optional translation capabilities, this won’t be enough in the long term. Especially since banks will need to consider the fraud and compliance issues inherent within this if they’re still actually processing MT messages.
What needs to happen?
What does the approaching deadline mean for European financial institutions? Will they need to complete a full ‘rip and replace’ of their payment engines? In time, perhaps, but this isn’t a feasible option in the short term and certainly not to hit the deadlines.
Yet even making alterations or updates to payments infrastructure is easier said than done. Most banks have multiple complex and highly personalized engines, which are difficult to adapt to new standards, especially given the need to keep operations running smoothly in the meantime. And though there are options on the market that can offer a conversion layer for ISO 20022 messages in and out, this doesn’t really provide banks or their customers with the full, rich data the standard is intended to provide.
It’s easy to see why a bank might fall back on a solution that only meets the minimum requirements of ISO 20022. However, since there’s no avoiding the direction of travel for financial messaging capabilities, a smarter move would be to invest in solutions that can iterate and adapt, providing an insulation layer that gives banks full oversight of rich data messages, while protecting the existing engines from the strict deadlines of the mandatory migration.
Even this phased approach will demand immediate action. From our experience, getting the necessary insulation layer in place is a process that might take 9-12 months, with a committed time investment from the line of business, risk and compliance, and operations teams. So, while an immediate start is needed in order to hit the deadline comfortably, the window of opportunity is still very much open.
A partner for progress
The key trick to meeting the migration deadline is to work with a partner that can provide ISO 20022 native solutions, delivered with technical expertise and causing minimal disruption. For European organizations, the move to ISO 20022 is a regulatory event that can’t be avoided, no matter the challenges that exist. While time is certainly running out, there are options available – especially for those that invest in solutions designed for rapid deployment with the ability to continually evolve as required.
And, done right, this process won’t only enable European banks to meet requirements. It can also be transformed into a business opportunity, creating a more agile payments environment and helping banks compete more effectively over the next decade and beyond.
Understanding ISO 20022 and its requirements is the first step to building an effective strategy for implementation. With insights from payment experts, we’ve debunked some popular myths around the messaging standard. Download our eBook now to learn more.
Related Blog Posts
Grocery Shoppers Show Omnivorous Appetite for Omni-Channel
Digital acceleration and the massive growth in eCommerce sales in 2020 have not gone unnoticed by those in the connected world. Largely driven by the COVID-19 pandemic, ACI Worldwide data analysis showed that global online sales in the general retail sector were up 209 percent in April and 81 percent in May (compared to the previous year), and overall eCommerce sales continued to show an uplift of more than 20 percent compared to a year earlier in November.
Merchants Don’t Need a Payments Gateway, They Need a Payments Hub
The term “payments gateway” over-simplifies what it takes to process a payment. The terminology comes from the early days of online payment processing, but has now entered the vernacular for all aspects of merchant payments, including online, mobile and in-store.
How to Recession-Proof Your Retail Business in 2021
2020 has been a challenging year for retailers; many were — understandably — unprepared to deal with the pandemic. With millions of people in the U.K. in lockdown, consumers and businesses have had to change the way they work and live, and the way they shop and pay.
Adding Fuel to the Fraud Fire
Payments fraud is a widespread and difficult issue in the fuel segment. Fuel dispensers are a common target for certain types of fraud – and fuel merchants often lack visibility into the level and impact of that fraud.
The Rise of “Invisible Payments” in Latin America
For retailers throughout LATAM (and the world), driving sales and loyalty depends on keeping up with top payment trends, which are invariably driven by consumer demands. “Invisible payments” is an emerging trend that is already paying benefits for a host of retailers — and it could be a game-changer for Latin America.
Agnosticity: Giving Fuel Merchants the Freedom and Flexibility to Innovate
The absolute minimum that customers demand from their transaction at the fuel stop is a fast, convenient and secure payments experience. But there is also room for fuel merchants to build loyalty and boost upselling by delivering more than just a good price on fuel and a fast payments process.
Could COVID-19 Be India’s Cashless Catalyst?
India’s push towards a digital economy has accelerated over the years, with a supportive regulatory environment, home-grown technologies and innovation around digital infrastructure improving “last mile” connectivity to the remote towns and rural areas of the country. While the “Digital India” drive has been consistent, the COVID-19 pandemic has brought out the true value of digitization for businesses and consumers alike. It is a watershed moment and has fast-tracked the pace of digital adoption, particularly for payments, which now plays a critical role in economic recovery.
Platform Driven Payments Can Drive Improved Profitability for Fuel and Convenience Store Merchants
Those of us who drive often don’t think too much about refueling our cars unless or until our tanks are nearing empty. And as long as the price is acceptable and the transaction efficient, a quick, convenient fill up is all we need.
Only One-Third of Major Fuel Merchants Have Fully Implemented EMV and 20 Percent are Still in the Planning Stage
Earlier this year, we blogged about the issue of EMV implementation in the U.S. fuel sector and the fraud issues fuel merchants can expect to see if they’re not ready by the extended April 2021 deadline.
Omni-Commerce Is Heating Up the Merchant Token Revolution
Merchants around the world have embraced the wisdom of keeping sensitive customer data (such as card numbers) out of their own environments, with tokens emerging as the tool of choice to bridge the gap. Merchant functions — including reservations, returns, reporting, rewards, research, reconciliation and more — have typically required access to sensitive data, but a series of high-profile breaches has highlighted the need to store card numbers in tightly secured safe harbors.