Why Banks Must Democratize Machine Learning for Fraud Prevention and Payments Intelligence
Banks are already actively on the path to digital transformation, considering new technologies, new customer experiences and new business models. A critical piece of this digital transformation centers on better understanding the wealth of data within the banks’ systems and mining it for improved customer insight. In the New Payments Ecosystem, data is as valuable to the bank and its customers as the deposits held in their accounts, and it should be protected, and leveraged for the benefit of the customer.
Machine learning is well acknowledged as one of the new technologies needed to interrogate the vast volume and variety of data within the banks’ operations. Humans cannot possibly process the data at the same speed and scale. However, a bank-wide machine learning project is a huge undertaking, requiring major investment in technology and human resources. Some banks feel disillusioned by these very projects that, in the past, have failed to deliver a return on investment. But there is an area of the banks’ business where smaller, more tactical machine learning projects can be rapidly deployed in a way that delivers value to the business from day one: fraud prevention.
Machine learning in fraud prevention
In the fraud shop, there is a wealth of human expertise that can be used to guide new machine learning models. The current barrier to delivering this often lies in the solutions themselves. They require data scientists to create the initial models. A fraud analyst knows that a specific correlation between transaction types in a sequence is a strong fraud indicator, but the data scientist will need many more interactions to draw the same conclusion. The machine learning model is only as good as the signals it is given. Solutions that enable business users (the fraud experts) to input the initial correlations will deliver results faster in terms of identifying new correlations across different data sets. This ‘democratization of machine learning’ empowers business users to ‘download’ their knowledge and experience into the models. The machine learning models depend on fraud occurrences in order to learn, but fraud is actually a relatively small percentage of successful transactions. Fraud analysts can direct machine learning to investigate and improve in areas where fraud has not yet reached critical mass, but the expert knows that this is a potential ‘greenfield’ for fraud. It’s about bringing machine learning closer to the user and their instincts, rather than bringing the user to the machine learning. In this way, the organization can shorten the time to Return on Investment (ROI) of their machine learning projects.
Democratizing machine learning
The democratization of machine learning can be used to support business users to express their instinctive decisions around desirable traits for transactions or customer behaviours, even if these are not yet fraudulent or highly indicative of fraud. Feedback on these kinds of instincts will aid the machine learning model to fine tune itself, and improve accuracy and consistency in identifying more complex fraud indicators. Business users are closer to the models; they have transparent views of the model and can apply strategies and controls to best leverage the outcome of the intelligence from the models. Continuous involvement of business users is key to developing the machine learning model over time. They will still input to the model and investigate the output as the model generates intelligence and use their human expertise to confirm fraud instances. But they can also combine their omnichannel customer view, with insights correctly generated by the model. If the human intelligence confirms the insights, these can be fed back into the model: if the model consistently flags a correlation between data sets as potential fraud, and the analysts consistently confirm this as fraud, then a strategy and control based on this information can be added to underpin the model. These can be used to automate the decisions that business users have consistently made, and reduce the need for auto actions that impact the customer experience. It’s about managing that customer experience with the arsenal available to them, and turning machine learning for fraud prevention toward a customer-centric financial services relationship.
The market recognizes that machine learning as a technology has passed its peak, and is now establishing itself across organizations. This means that the business must bring that technology closer to its business case to drive value from what is fast becoming a commodity. In the payments fraud context, I expect this to materialize in the democratization of machine learning. I see a future where the business user, in this case the fraud analyst, will have increasing influence on the evolution of models, in order to deliver the best possible customer experience.
Want to improve customer service and reduce fraud? Download our guide: The Six-Step Guide to Leveraging Machine Learning for Payments Intelligence
Related Blog Posts
No Margin for Error: Acquirers Must Now Master the Art of Reinvention [Q&A]
The digital transformation of banking and growing competition within the industry is rapidly changing the world of global acquirers. Long gone are the days when an acquirer’s primary role was simply to facilitate an acceptance ecosystem for credit card payments. As part of its new “Prime Time for Real-Time” report, ACI recently published No Margin for Error, an eBook looking at the changes — and challenges — facing acquirers. I spoke to Ruth Fornell, our executive vice president – consumer payments, about the key insights, why acquirers are being forced to rethink their business models and what the future may hold.
Digital Payments: A Creature Comfort in the Era of COVID-19
Humans have an impressive ability to adapt – and have quickly done so in terms of their spending behaviors and choice of payment methods in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lockdowns forced many to consider cash alternatives to make payments, driving a huge surge in demand for digital payment services. And in some European countries, demand has risen as much as 81 percent.
Why Human Nature Presents a Challenge for Acquirers
It’s one of the great paradoxes of human behavior: people are predictably unpredictable. We work in irrational ways, hearts win out over heads and the unexpected can rapidly become the norm. Try as we might, predicting the emergence of any new trend is difficult – particularly in unpredictable times – and this is just as true in the world of payments as it is elsewhere.
How ISO 20022 Represents Both a Challenge and an Opportunity for Southeast Asia’s Payments Landscape
Governments across Southeast Asia (SEA) are increasingly recognizing the vital role that payments play in the engines of their economies, which has resulted in a number of payments modernization initiatives such as those in Vietnam and Malaysia (PayNet). Yet there is one particular area in which SEA’s financial institutions might still be lagging behind their global counterparts: the adoption of ISO 20022, which has become the global standard for high-value payments and immediate payments (IP) when it comes to cross-border payments.
Ready or Not, The Time Is Now for Real-Time Payments
Research from ACI and GlobalData confirms that demand for real-time payments is only going in one direction: up. The root cause of this increasing demand is rising customer expectations and behaviors; clunky and opaque payment experiences are becoming less tolerable in a world where customers can buy, watch and listen to almost anything with a swipe, tap or click.
When It Comes to Payments, COVID-19 Crisis Could Lead to Long-Term Shifts in Consumer Behavior [Q&A]
ACI Worldwide and GlobalData recently launched Prime Time for Real-Time, a new global report tracking and analyzing real-time payments volumes, growth and dynamics across 30 global markets. According to the global research, an industry first, more than half a trillion real-time payments transactions will be processed over the next five years. I discussed what the findings mean, and how the COVID-19 pandemic might be a further catalyst for behavioral change, with ACI’s global head of real-time payments, Craig Ramsey.
TCH RTP and FedNow: What’s Next for U.S. Immediate Payments?
It has taken some time, but immediate payments (IP) are on the move in the United States. Although the speed of adoption has been slightly behind the curve of regions like India, the Nordics and the U.K., the U.S. has seen significant year-on-year IP growth of 69 percent.
Social, Mobile and Instant Payments: How Digital Payment Overlay Services Will Power Up P27
For some years now, the Nordics region has been a global-standard bearer for payments and financial services innovation. Sweden has for many years been a leader in the progressive move towards cashlessness, championing the range of efficiencies that it brings. Major payments innovators like Klarna, FundedByMe and iZettle are based in the region, rubber-stamping Stockholm as a genuine fintech hub. Analysts and insight leaders also regularly single the Nordics out as a genuine leader, in particular praising the collaboration between governments, regulators, financial institutions and businesses that has led to such fertile ground for financial modernization initiatives.
How to Meet ISO 20022 Migration Deadlines for Fedwire and SWIFT
Over the next decade, we will undoubtedly see huge shifts in how financial institutions throughout North America transact, whether domestically or across international borders. This will be driven not just by changing technologies, but also by regulatory events – such as the widespread adoption of financial messaging standards like ISO 20022.
How Can European Banks Meet the ISO 20022 Migration Deadlines for TARGET2 and SWIFT?
First published in 2004 – and already broadly used in some quarters – ISO 20022 is rapidly set to become the de facto standard for financial messaging around the world, replacing MT messages.