EBAday 2020: Reaping the Full Potential of Real-Time Payments
Real-time payments are growing rapidly worldwide. In fact, according to ACI’s Prime Time for Real-Time report, more than half a trillion real-time payments transactions will be processed over the next five years. ACI’s Dean Wallace, director solution leadership, Real-Time and Digital, recently took part in an EBAday panel to discuss what businesses need from banks to reap the full potential of real-time payments, how fintechs can assist and how collaboration can be advanced on a global scale. I caught up with Dean to discuss the latest insights.
Katrin Boettger: What’s the current state of play when it comes to real-time payments?
Dean Wallace: Many banks already have real-time capabilities, or they are planning to launch them soon. Real-time is a catalyst and will have a knock-on effect on how everything else works in the bank. More importantly, real-time enables new digital payment layers and capabilities – such as Request to Pay services – in which many banks are investing.
To echo the views of one senior banker I spoke to during the event, real-time is not a product banks have asked for. It’s been pushed into the market, and with “Big Tech” and the likes of Google Pay expected to come to market by harnessing real-time payments through PSD2 capabilities, we are now looking at a “do or die” moment for some banks’ payment offerings. Real-time payments are the new normal, not only in Europe, but globally. Real-time drives commoditization of financial payment processing and the end-game scenario is a complete instant global banking world, which will be based on the ISO 20022 technical standard and leveraged through real-time and digital means for enhanced customer experiences.
KB: Are banks responding quickly enough to support their businesses in this real-time world?
DW: It's been picking up pace in Europe, though the region is still not as far as other markets, including China, Malaysia and India, among others. On the flipside, many of these markets are also looking to Europe and the models developed here, like PSD2 and open banking, and the products and services being offered to corporates.
During the recent EBAday session, the audience was asked “what best describes your bank’s current position, when considering what businesses need from banks to reap the benefits of real-time payments.” 39 percent said they are currently building real-time propositions for their business customers and 32 percent said they already have real-time propositions for their business customers. 19 percent answered that they already have real-time propositions for their business customers and are seeking fintech partners to enhance their proposition, while 10 percent already have real-time propositions for their business customers and have integrated fintech propositions into their customer services. This shows that building new services for business customers is very much on the agenda for banks – and that partnerships with fintechs will play a major role.
KB: When considering real-time services for businesses, what do you think the “killer propositions” will be?
DW: In the U.K. we have a saying, “horses for courses.” In other words, it depends very much on the type of corporate. The needs of a corporate are different compared to those of a small business. Typically, a small to medium-sized business needs liquidity; it is looking for real-time funds and for direct settlement. At the other end of the spectrum, let's take a large supermarket chain for example; they will not be looking for liquidity, but will need the data quickly. They want to mine and analyze it so they can make better offers to their customers and add value back into their business. They will also be looking to lower costs and improve operational efficiency. Looking at another industry, for example airlines, both liquidity and data will help improve the price offering for flights. So, what the “killer propositions” will be depends very much on what kind of business you are looking at.
KB: Looking ahead, what are the key developments and trends we are going to see in the next few years?
DW: There is an expectation that, as an industry, we will deliver cross-border, real-time payments. Even regionally, cross-border, real-time payments are not easy, but in international cross-border, there are new challenges and complexities that don’t exist in a domestic or regional setting. SWIFT is playing an important role already with some offerings. We certainly see interesting developments in Europe with the EPC SEPA Instant Credit Transfer (SCT Inst) scheme, with the TARGET Instant Payment Settlement (TIPS), as well as the P27 initiative across the Nordic countries. In Malaysia, ACI provides the central infrastructure solutions with our partner PayNet, supporting the development of a broader Asia payments network. So, you have the emergence of these “corridors” in Europe and Asia, while LATAM is starting to pick up pace, and the U.S. has TCH and FedNow on the horizon…all these schemes are following the same adoption patterns. I can see a world where that interoperability will happen.
Find out how to capitalize on the growth of real-time payments.
Related Blog Posts
Utilities: It’s Time to Put Your Arrears Behind You
As the economic crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic left many utilities customers financially insecure and unable to pay their bills, states across the country issued unprecedented moratoriums on utility shutoffs. But, as the pandemic continues, many states are beginning to lift those moratoriums, leaving customers responsible for paying back the $40+ billion in debt they owe to their utilities billers.
How to Resolve Delayed Mail Issues with Digital Payments
In light of the pandemic, the United States Postal Service (USPS) has been facing its own crisis. In late December 2020, only 38 percent of non-local first-class mail arrived on time, compared with 92 percent during the same time period in 2019. While mail delays may be considered a minor inconvenience for some consumers who receive late-arriving packages, there can be serious implications for those who rely on traditional mail to receive and pay their bills each month.
Data Security Is Table Stakes for Bill Payment – Communication Can Be the Competitive Differentiator
More than 80 percent of consumers are at least somewhat concerned about online identity theft, and nearly half are concerned about the safety of their personal information when paying online, according to the latest ACI Speedpay Pulse. But, despite these concerns, consumers have embraced the convenience that digital technology brings to their daily lives. Fortunately, these new digital experiences have been positive and are driving consumer confidence in data security: nearly half of those surveyed believe their data is safer than it was five years ago.
Billing Experts Predict Consumers Will Be Driving Force Behind Payments Industry Changes in 2021
As we near the end of 2020, the pandemic and its resulting economic fallout continue to wreak havoc: COVID-19 cases are increasing, raising concerns about an economic recession and instilling uncertainty among consumers about their financial security. In fact, 15 percent of consumers who responded to a recent ACI Speedpay Pulse survey reported that the pandemic was a direct factor in missing a bill payment. And of those consumers who currently have past-due payments, more than a third believe it will take them at least six months to catch up on late bills.
Customer Experience: A Key Ingredient for Biller Success
Today’s consumers are looking for fast and seamless experiences across the board, including when it comes to making bill payments. Understandably, slow and inconvenient experiences lead to lost loyalty and likely attrition – especially with consumers paying up to 10 bills per month, according to recent findings from the ACI Speedpay Pulse.
Filling the Gaps: How Higher Ed Institutions Can Put Money Back into Their Budgets
At a time when budgets at colleges and universities are tighter than a snare drum, where can schools turn to find the funds for their finance and IT departments? Sure, donors and alums may be tempting sources, but one answer to this funding issue is actually quite simple:
How Billers Can Adapt to a Changing Payments Security Landscape
More and more consumers are adopting digital channels like websites and mobile apps to pay their bills; but at the same time, hackers are becoming more sophisticated and cyberattacks are increasing in frequency. In fact, nearly 20 percent of consumers have fallen victim to online identity theft, according to our most recent ACI Speedpay Pulse, pointing to an opportunity for billers to up the ante when it comes to security measures.
Cut Your Losses – It’s Time to Digitize Medical Loss Ratio Rebate Payments
The deadline to issue medical loss ratio (MLR) rebates for 2020 is next week, yet many health insurers are meeting the requirement by sending paper checks in the mail. Meanwhile, only seven percent of health care premium payments are paid by check, according to the 2020 ACI Speedpay Pulse survey on billing and payment preferences. Policyholders receiving these checks may not understand why they are receiving them – if they even open the envelope in the first place.
Recurring Success: Exploring Subscription Payment Trends
When you think of recurring monthly expenses, there are certain obvious bills that come to mind: mortgage or rent, utilities and phone bill, among others. But today, monthly recurring expenses increasingly include things like online streaming services (music and entertainment), meal kits, pet treats, video games and clothing. It seems there’s a subscription service for everything these days — and consumers are taking full advantage.
Age Matters: Generational Preferences in Bill Payments
Digitalization has taken the mainstage in the payments industry due to changing consumer preferences and now, in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, necessity. According to the 2020 ACI Speedpay Pulse report, one in four consumers has increased their usage of the biller’s website to pay bills, while one in five has decreased the number of payments they send by mail or make in person at a physical location. In addition, more consumers prefer digital statements (48.2%) to paper statements (25%), while around a quarter prefer to receive both digital and paper (26.8%).