Request for Pay – What Does It Mean For Financial Institutions?
What do banks – one with $60B+ in assets, one a mid-size regional bank, and one, a small innovative credit union – have in common with payment networks and the ‘Big 4’ consulting firms? They were all part of the first ACI #PaymentsForBreakfast event in North America! The theme was real-time payments, but the focus was more specifically on Request for Pay.
What is Request for Pay?
Real-time payments are becoming the new normal, and digital transformation is the next step in revolutionizing banking in the U.S. A key product in this arsenal is Request for Pay (RfP) – an instant payment that enables a simple, instant and seamless payment experience for both the payer and receiver.
Request for Pay acts like a real-time Direct Debit, but in this case, it allows the payer greater control of their transaction; the ability to check their balance, choose the specific account from which they want to pay, delay a payment, question the amount, or opt to pay in part. The benefit for the recipient is the certainty of funds, thanks to a reduction in ‘bounced’ Direct Debits, which has the potential to reduce costs and improve liquidity. Banks are incentivized to offer “Request for Pay” by receiving a transaction fee, which not only compensates for loss of revenue from more traditional payment methods such as cards, but also helps them to future-proof revenue streams.Citibank’s whitepaper [PDF] is great primer on this – the diagram below shows a sample payment flow.
Sample payment flow for 'Request for Pay'
Our #PaymentsforBreakfast audience in Chicago was very engaged throughout the highly interactive session. We talked about the difference between Request for Pay and other alternative payment methods, the need for millennials (and all generations) to maintain control over their finances, and finally, the barriers to adoption faced by Request for Pay.
The session examined three types of use cases:
Peer-to-Peer or Person-to-Person (P2P)
This is the simplest of the use cases considered. An example would be when I forget to take out cash to pay our babysitter, and so they ask for a request for pay before they leave. This raises challenges, such as whether the payer and payee have different banks, and how this might disrupt the payment. For instance, is there a requirement for banks to put a “freemium” model in place as part of their roll-out? There are also questions around how the message gets delivered. In other parts of the world, the request for payment can be made via WhatsApp. However, this would be a challenge in the US market due to the need for additional tokenization layers. Current evidence has shown that consumers are willing to use mobile-centric apps to exchange money, but ensuring separate banks work together (beyond Zelle) will be an interesting and key development. Our #PaymentsForBreakfast audience saw much of the value for the banks coming from the data, and the advances in data-mining and predictive analytics providing better cross-sell opportunities.
One scenario here would be a lawn service company pinning a bill to your back door, asking for payment via check or cash. In this situation, the audience discussed issues around ease of payment, and how automated reminders could prove to be an attractive component of RfP for smaller businesses.
The same case study, using a lawn service company, was also used for B2B – where the request for pay would be sent to a corporate. But in this instance, it was concluded that the payment requests would have to be integrated into internal systems, such as invoicing and accounts payable.
Generating Extra Revenue Streams with Request for Pay
Whilst it was agreed that P2P was not an area where banks could charge, because consumers now expect services for free as part of their personal banking service, potential was seen for B2B. In this instance, it was felt that nominal fees could be charged for RfP based on the capture and storage of data, particularly for small businesses focusing on their retention strategies. Small businesses don’t typically have a deep integration with their back-office capabilities, so they are looking at ways to make their business more efficient – and a core element of this is their business banking. In fact, in a study carried out by YouGov in 2017, 74% of small business said that real-time would improve how they receive payments from customers.
The benefits are also there from the payee point of view, as 55% said it would help improve the way they pay vendors and suppliers. Overall, 65% of small and medium-sized business said that if they weren’t offered real-time, they would consider switching banks. This shows a clear demand, backed up by our audience in Chicago, who were quick to identify how the consumerization of banking and payments would help overcome business inertia and obstacles.
The Bigger Picture
A survey conducted during our recent webinar ‘How can banks unlock the value of ‘Request for Pay?’ (attended by 150 financial institutions) again demonstrated there is a growing appetite to provide RfP in the corporate space, with more than half of the US banks surveyed viewing the value and volume for RfP most likely coming from corporate customers rather than consumers. Even so, 7% said they were ready to go live imminently across all use cases, and 45% were exploring and finalizing their strategy to ensure a competitive advantage with all their customers.
Related Blog Posts
Request for Payment and Other Real-Time Payments Trends That Will Shape 2020
In 2020, the conversation around real-time payments will increasingly be about what banks can do with real-time, as they move beyond setting up to support real-time payments schemes. New use cases will emerge – but there are a few main trends that are likely to shape the direction of real-time in the year ahead.
2020: The Year of (Near) Cashless Transactions?
Happy belated New Year and raise your hand if you make and/or follow New Year’s resolutions. I used to and then realized they were exercises in futility. But, over this past holiday, I thought I’d give the resolution game one more shot. This one was more a realistic goal than it was a resolution, but who can really tell the difference anyway!?! I decided to go cashless over the holidays, which can still be somewhat challenging for many in the US (though my friends in other countries are probably ridiculing me right now). I was traveling (to NYC and Florida) and wanted to pack as little as possible (in both my luggage and my wallet). I’m all about loyalty card points these days, hence the 2 back-to-back trips.
Three Merchant Payment Trends to Watch in 2020
In 2019, merchants everywhere were challenged by pressure from new entrants, the continued breakdown of traditional industry boundaries and growing customer preference for a digitally-led or digitally-influenced purchasing experience.
The Invisibility Cloak of Payments: What Are the Consequences?
If you could pick any superpower, what would you pick? Children often pick "invisibility.” Oh, the possibilities of being invisible! What fun! You can walk into a candy store and take all the candy you want, you can stay downstairs late with your parents and listen to what they’re saying, you can sneak out without anybody noticing… But when you think about it, there are also disadvantages that come with this superpower.
Looking Back at Money20/20 USA: Where Do We Go From Here?
Now that the dust has settled on another successful Money20/20 USA in Las Vegas, it allows for a moment of reflection on what some of the announcements and trends mean for the ever-changing financial industry. Discussions spanned a variety of topics, including the future of international and digital expansion of PSPs, how organizations developing cryptocurrency wallets plan to enter the payments space, and how challenger banks plan to revolutionize the banking experience. Inclusivity was a recurring theme throughout – and nowhere was this more evident than in the Rise Up program.
2020 Fraud Predictions: What to Expect Across the Globe as Cybercrime Evolves
Our payment experts take stock of the trends that shaped 2019 and make their predictions for where they see the industry heading in 2020.
I sat down with our own fraud experts, Marc Trepanier, principal fraud consultant for North America, and Giselle Lindley, principal fraud consultant for APAC, to get their thoughts on what we can expect in the year ahead around payments fraud.
Real-Time Payments Hits Its Stride in the U.S.
The recent announcement of FedNow in the U.S., the launch of cross-border services like SWIFT gpi, and multiple real-time payment systems including The Clearing House’s (TCH) RTP system and Zelle underline the fact that real-time payments are here to stay. The need to deliver real-time payment services to customers has never been more pressing for banks, credit unions, processors, acquirers and fintechs. However, the U.S. payments ecosystem – and its infrastructure – must keep pace with global markets to remain competitive, and interoperability between real-time payment systems will be key.
Deep Dive: Latin American Fintech Market (Part 2)
To support fintechs’ development and create a more inclusive financial system, governments across the Latin American region should adopt different regulations. Some good practices implemented in other countries, like the U.K. or Singapore, could also be adopted in Latin America, such as temporary exemptions on fintech authorizations on behalf of regulating entities, or the creation of temporary regulation sandboxes in which fintechs can operate, evaluate their business models and offer their innovative products in supervised environments.
Women in Payments: “Make Failure Your Fuel”
ACI’s Darcy Locke, new business development principal, was recently appointed Chair of the American Financial Services Association (AFSA), Business Partner Board. During her two-year term, Darcy will preside over the AFSA Business Partner Board meetings, and concurrently serve as a member of the AFSA Board of Directors and Chair of the AFSA Business Partner Task Force.