Winners and Losers in the Regulation Vs Competition Debate? How About New Business Models?
As Summer has abruptly turned to Fall, I have found myself daydreaming of a European vacation (and yes, I realize it’s Fall there too… or rather, Autumn). Maybe it’s the Instagram feed full of friends on a summer sojourn to Italy, France, or Germany, or the constant barrage of Premier League kickoff commercials on the NBC Networks (Let’s Go Gunners!), but yesterday it was something else entirely that had me drifting off into a memory-induced Nutella-crepe state of euphoria.
The US Treasury Department released what can only be called a “canary in a coal mine” report; it makes a slew of recommendations to basically overhaul the entire US financial technology sector and to move the US back to the top of the innovation discussion (at least in terms of financial services).
You may be saying to yourself, “Mark, you are certifiably crazy; 1) chèvre (goat cheese) crepes are where the crepe pyramid of tasty hits its apex and 2) we have been talking about a lot of these things for years - this is just someone in Washington catching up to the rest of us because we are a competition-driven economy and sector.
While we all have our differences on the sweet vs savory crepe discussion, Nutella is a gift, and while your logic is sound on point number 2, it misses the point. In the US, we are being driven by competition to a certain extent, but what we have learned in the aftermath of PSD2 and Open Banking is that competition can only get us so far. There is a very high barrier to entry that must be overcome. And for the flaws in those regulations, the overall intent has become clear; get more ideas into the market to drive us all forward. In the US, that bar was artificially lowered by the large amount of investment into FinTech startups, but at the end of the day, more than 75 percent of our accounts are held with just five institutions. So while innovation can happen, it hasn’t spread as quickly as it potentially could.
The interesting thing to me, in the whole discussion on regulations vs competition pushing innovation, is the discussion on who “wins” and who “loses” in each model. This argument misses the point of where the “Open” discussion is leading. Claiming someone will win, while someone else will lose, assumes that the current business models that are at play remain unchanged. At the end of the day, they can’t – the current business models have to change to unlock the potential windfall that is sitting on the other side of this debate. We have overused this saying over the past 5 years when discussing the New Payments Ecosystem, however it still bears repeating here; a rising tide raises all boats. And the US just let us know that they are readying the harbor for the incoming tide – I just hope it’s not too late!
Download our whitepaper “Open APIs: Seize the Opportunity”[pdf] to find out more.
Related Blog Posts
Taking a Holistic View of ISO 20022 Migration and Payments Modernization in the Pacific
Today’s payments modernization efforts, most notably real-time payments, not only work to satisfy changing consumer preferences and behaviors, they also serve to future-proof national economies throughout the world. But for real-time payments to deliver maximum value, consumers and financial institutions must be able to exchange meaningful and actionable information — hence the development of ISO 20022, a standard for electronic data interchange that facilitates the fast, standardized and secure exchange of financial messages across borders.
How ISO 20022 Represents Both a Challenge and an Opportunity for Southeast Asia’s Payments Landscape
Governments across Southeast Asia (SEA) are increasingly recognizing the vital role that payments play in the engines of their economies, which has resulted in a number of payments modernization initiatives such as those in Vietnam and Malaysia (PayNet). Yet there is one particular area in which SEA’s financial institutions might still be lagging behind their global counterparts: the adoption of ISO 20022, which has become the global standard for high-value payments and immediate payments (IP) when it comes to cross-border payments.
Ready or Not, The Time Is Now for Real-Time Payments
Research from ACI and GlobalData confirms that demand for real-time payments is only going in one direction: up. The root cause of this increasing demand is rising customer expectations and behaviors; clunky and opaque payment experiences are becoming less tolerable in a world where customers can buy, watch and listen to almost anything with a swipe, tap or click.
When It Comes to Payments, COVID-19 Crisis Could Lead to Long-Term Shifts in Consumer Behavior [Q&A]
ACI Worldwide and GlobalData recently launched Prime Time for Real-Time, a new global report tracking and analyzing real-time payments volumes, growth and dynamics across 30 global markets. According to the global research, an industry first, more than half a trillion real-time payments transactions will be processed over the next five years. I discussed what the findings mean, and how the COVID-19 pandemic might be a further catalyst for behavioral change, with ACI’s global head of real-time payments, Craig Ramsey.
TCH RTP and FedNow: What’s Next for U.S. Immediate Payments?
It has taken some time, but immediate payments (IP) are on the move in the United States. Although the speed of adoption has been slightly behind the curve of regions like India, the Nordics and the U.K., the U.S. has seen significant year-on-year IP growth of 69 percent.
Social, Mobile and Instant Payments: How Digital Payment Overlay Services Will Power Up P27
For some years now, the Nordics region has been a global-standard bearer for payments and financial services innovation. Sweden has for many years been a leader in the progressive move towards cashlessness, championing the range of efficiencies that it brings. Major payments innovators like Klarna, FundedByMe and iZettle are based in the region, rubber-stamping Stockholm as a genuine fintech hub. Analysts and insight leaders also regularly single the Nordics out as a genuine leader, in particular praising the collaboration between governments, regulators, financial institutions and businesses that has led to such fertile ground for financial modernization initiatives.
Women in Payments: Celebrating International Women’s Day 2020
International Women’s Day, celebrated on March 8, honors the social, economic, cultural and political achievements of women – including equality for all women.
To commemorate the occasion, we spoke with a few female leaders in the payments industry about what the day means both for them and for the wider payments industry. The comments and insights we received were nothing short of inspiring and encouraging.
Women in Payments: Student Perspectives on the Payments Industry (Part 1)
Last month, ACI’s Omaha office hosted six students from the University of Nebraska Omaha’s Information Technology department for a one-day event, showcasing ACI’s solution offerings and the company’s role in the global payments industry. The six students, all of whom were members of UNO’s Association for Computing Machinery-Women (ACM-W) chapter, had previously participated in one of ACI Omaha’s Coding for Girls Camps.
How to Meet ISO 20022 Migration Deadlines for Fedwire and SWIFT
Over the next decade, we will undoubtedly see huge shifts in how financial institutions throughout North America transact, whether domestically or across international borders. This will be driven not just by changing technologies, but also by regulatory events – such as the widespread adoption of financial messaging standards like ISO 20022.
How Can European Banks Meet the ISO 20022 Migration Deadlines for TARGET2 and SWIFT?
First published in 2004 – and already broadly used in some quarters – ISO 20022 is rapidly set to become the de facto standard for financial messaging around the world, replacing MT messages.