Vanilla Payments Don't Always Cut the Mustard
Five years ago, there was a clear trend among major brick-and-mortar retailers to bring in their own payments software. Except for very small retailers that used bank-owned stand-alone POS terminals, retailers wanted to own and operate their own systems – usually licensed products from a small number of specialist payments software vendors. This approach gave retailers flexibility, control and cost savings through centralization. Other than the bank-owned terminal approach, there were few viable alternatives.
Tastes are changing…
Over the past few years, the market has changed, as have the attitudes of retailers. Traditional product vendors still exist and many retailers still run their own payments systems, but the trend is now clearly toward managed service providers – and in a growing number of cases these are cloud payment services.
This trend is largely driven by the potential for reductions in operational expenditure, and the ever-increasing burden of security regulations and practices; point-2-point encryption (P2PE) being used as a means to deal with PCI DSS requirements being one example. Accordingly, many of those traditional product vendors have evolved to use their own technology as the basis for managed payments services.
The question of choosing the right vendor for their payment services is a complex one for retailers, and price is always a significant factor. Retailers are master negotiators by nature, and they desire the lowest cost with the least risk. As a result, a number of vendors provide a simple ‘vanilla’ service — sharing the same payments service across many retailers — in essence, a POS terminal (or PIN Entry Device) and a rapid onboarding process, with little flexibility.
Flexibility is becoming a prerequisite, not just a ‘nice to have’
But for many retailers, flexibility and control over payments must not be sacrificed, especially as payments is increasingly seen as a key means of improving customer engagement and meeting consumers’ expectations of convenience.
However, if a retailer that has opted for ‘vanilla’ needs something with a different flavor— prioritization over competitors, quick changes to their setup, access to different acquirers, different POS terminals, or the ability to enter a new market — the answer from the vendor may simply be “no” or “it’ll have to wait.” But, at this point the retailer is locked in.
The more flexible, unbundled approach may come at a higher price, but likely includes a dedicated payments system that is customizable to the specific needs of that retailer. So, the retailer still retains some control over their own destiny, but with the advantages of it being run as a managed service. The payments vendor operates it, but with the ability to configure, customize and shape the service to retailers’ demands.
The more innovative the retailer seeks to be, and the more the retailer sees payments as a competitive differentiator, the more the demand will grow for the sort of flexible solutions that a simple vanilla service cannot offer. It’s the more exotic ‘flavors’ that will allow retailers to react to their business drivers for mobile app payments, faster payments, biometric payments… or whatever else is coming down the line.
Long-term roadmaps for payments are difficult for retailers to establish, because the rate of change is so rapid. Having a flexible payments service provider at least positions the retailer so that it can adapt to meet that challenge of change, and react to the unpredictable.
Getting the balance right is the dilemma. It’s clear that retailers won’t be running their own payment systems in the future as they have in the past, but when it comes to finding a supplier to provide a payments service, each will need to decide whether their tastes are plain, or whether they need something with a little more zing.
Download the report: ‘The role of payments in the customer experience’, by Retail Week and ACI Worldwide, drawing on interviews with 30 leading retailers in the United Kingdom, France, Germany and the U.S. and containing insights on enabling seamless shopper journeys, choosing payment technologies, and consolidating payment platforms.
Related Blog Posts
Strong Customer Authentication in Australia: Reducing CNP Fraud and Streamlining eCommerce Payments
Minimizing fraud without harming the customer experience can be done – using the right tools
In 2017-18, card-not-present (CNP) fraud cost Australian eCommerce AUD $478 million and accounted for some 85 percent of all fraud on Australian-issued cards1. In 2016, CNP fraud in Europe represented 70% of all card fraud2. Seriously uncomfortable numbers.
2020 Fraud Predictions: What to Expect Across the Globe as Cybercrime Evolves
As we near the end of 2019, our payment experts have begun to take stock of the trends over the last year, and make their predictions for where they see the industry heading in 2020.
I sat down with our own fraud experts, Marc Trepanier, principal fraud consultant for North America, and Giselle Lindley, principal fraud consultant for APAC, to get their thoughts on what we can expect in the year ahead around payments fraud.
Real-Time Payments Hits its Stride in the U.S.
The recent announcement of FedNow in the U.S., the launch of cross-border services like SWIFT gpi, and multiple real-time payment systems including The Clearing House’s (TCH) RTP system and Zelle underline the fact that real-time payments are here to stay. The need to deliver real-time payment services to customers has never been more pressing for banks, credit unions, processors, acquirers and fintechs. However, the U.S. payments ecosystem – and its infrastructure – must keep pace with global markets to remain competitive, and interoperability between real-time payment systems will be key.
Strong Customer Authentication under PSD2: Consumer Education Will Be Crucial to Success
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has finally provided the promised update on SCA supervisory flexibility timelines – with a new hard deadline for migration completion of December 31, 2020. According to the new guidelines, migration plans of PSPs – including the implementation and testing by merchants – should be completed by that date, otherwise all players could face serious penalties for non-compliance.
Deep Dive: Latin American Fintech Market (Part 2)
To support fintechs’ development and create a more inclusive financial system, governments across the Latin American region should adopt different regulations. Some good practices implemented in other countries, like the U.K. or Singapore, could also be adopted in Latin America, such as temporary exemptions on fintech authorizations on behalf of regulating entities, or the creation of temporary regulation sandboxes in which fintechs can operate, evaluate their business models and offer their innovative products in supervised environments.
Women in Payments: “Make Failure Your Fuel”
ACI’s Darcy Locke, new business development principal, was recently appointed Chair of the American Financial Services Association (AFSA), Business Partner Board. During her two-year term, Darcy will preside over the AFSA Business Partner Board meetings, and concurrently serve as a member of the AFSA Board of Directors and Chair of the AFSA Business Partner Task Force.
Deep Dive: Latin American Fintech Market (Part 1)
There is a gap between what financial institutions currently offer versus what today´s customers want in Latin America, and this is where fintechs are earning a reputation for customer-centricity, personalization, quick response and seamless delivery. The relationship between fintechs and traditional financial institutions in Latin America has evolved from competition to collaboration, with the aim of efficiently working together and effectively scaling innovation, while also driving financial inclusion for the underbanked.
From API to AI to I: Banking Tech Gets Personal
Tired feet. Running out of business cards. Countless LinkedIn connections – sound familiar? This time of the year is conference season; the annual SIBOS (SWIFT) and Money20/20 USA gatherings spanning the autumn give attendees plenty of hot topics and talking points. My American colleagues refer to this season as “the fall.” I trust this to be an observation on leaves and fruit rather than a sequitur on the state of the fintech industry. Either way, it’s a good time to harvest, to take stock and to work out what we should be doing with the apparent abundance of innovative produce.
India’s Unified Payments Interface: Breaking the Billion Barrier
September brought about quite a stir in the Indian payments ecosystem, with three years passing since the launch of UPI (Unified Payments Interface), and the realization that UPI is closing in on a significant milestone: one billion transactions per month. In September 2019, UPI clocked 955 million transactions, amounting to 1.61 trillion rupees (INR), demonstrating the extent to which Indian consumers have exuberantly welcomed real-time payments.
The Need for Financial Inclusion in Developing Countries
The payments ecosystem globally is changing – and the idea of financial inclusion is increasingly featuring as part of long-term strategy. At a glance, financial inclusion means that people and businesses have access to important financial products, services and data, such as transactions, credit cards, payments, savings and insurance, and that these are delivered in a sustainable way. The challenge for banks lies in being more inclusive and meeting social needs, while remaining profitable and increasing market share.