Vanilla Payments Don't Always Cut the Mustard
Five years ago, there was a clear trend among major brick-and-mortar retailers to bring in their own payments software. Except for very small retailers that used bank-owned stand-alone POS terminals, retailers wanted to own and operate their own systems – usually licensed products from a small number of specialist payments software vendors. This approach gave retailers flexibility, control and cost savings through centralization. Other than the bank-owned terminal approach, there were few viable alternatives.
Tastes are changing…
Over the past few years, the market has changed, as have the attitudes of retailers. Traditional product vendors still exist and many retailers still run their own payments systems, but the trend is now clearly toward managed service providers – and in a growing number of cases these are cloud payment services.
This trend is largely driven by the potential for reductions in operational expenditure, and the ever-increasing burden of security regulations and practices; point-2-point encryption (P2PE) being used as a means to deal with PCI DSS requirements being one example. Accordingly, many of those traditional product vendors have evolved to use their own technology as the basis for managed payments services.
The question of choosing the right vendor for their payment services is a complex one for retailers, and price is always a significant factor. Retailers are master negotiators by nature, and they desire the lowest cost with the least risk. As a result, a number of vendors provide a simple ‘vanilla’ service — sharing the same payments service across many retailers — in essence, a POS terminal (or PIN Entry Device) and a rapid onboarding process, with little flexibility.
Flexibility is becoming a prerequisite, not just a ‘nice to have’
But for many retailers, flexibility and control over payments must not be sacrificed, especially as payments is increasingly seen as a key means of improving customer engagement and meeting consumers’ expectations of convenience.
However, if a retailer that has opted for ‘vanilla’ needs something with a different flavor— prioritization over competitors, quick changes to their setup, access to different acquirers, different POS terminals, or the ability to enter a new market — the answer from the vendor may simply be “no” or “it’ll have to wait.” But, at this point the retailer is locked in.
The more flexible, unbundled approach may come at a higher price, but likely includes a dedicated payments system that is customizable to the specific needs of that retailer. So, the retailer still retains some control over their own destiny, but with the advantages of it being run as a managed service. The payments vendor operates it, but with the ability to configure, customize and shape the service to retailers’ demands.
The more innovative the retailer seeks to be, and the more the retailer sees payments as a competitive differentiator, the more the demand will grow for the sort of flexible solutions that a simple vanilla service cannot offer. It’s the more exotic ‘flavors’ that will allow retailers to react to their business drivers for mobile app payments, faster payments, biometric payments… or whatever else is coming down the line.
Long-term roadmaps for payments are difficult for retailers to establish, because the rate of change is so rapid. Having a flexible payments service provider at least positions the retailer so that it can adapt to meet that challenge of change, and react to the unpredictable.
Getting the balance right is the dilemma. It’s clear that retailers won’t be running their own payment systems in the future as they have in the past, but when it comes to finding a supplier to provide a payments service, each will need to decide whether their tastes are plain, or whether they need something with a little more zing.
Download the report: ‘The role of payments in the customer experience’, by Retail Week and ACI Worldwide, drawing on interviews with 30 leading retailers in the United Kingdom, France, Germany and the U.S. and containing insights on enabling seamless shopper journeys, choosing payment technologies, and consolidating payment platforms.
Related Blog Posts
Southeast Asia’s Domestic Payments Infrastructure Has Laid the Foundation for a Cross-Border Real-Time Network
Over the past decade, economies across Asia have been on the path to payments modernization, upgrading and replacing domestic payments infrastructure to make payments cheaper, faster and better. While the focus has been on domestic gains, this has set the foundation for a broader, cross-border real-time network – especially in Southeast Asia.
From ‘Access to Cash’ to ‘Access to Digital’ – How Innovative Thinking is Keeping SMEs Trading
With millions of people in London and the wider U.K. having endured lockdowns and restrictions, the COVID-19 pandemic has had a massive impact on our shopping habits. While some supermarkets have struggled to keep up with customer demand and social distancing rules, many small, local business have adapted to the crisis quickly, efficiently and in innovative ways. While supermarkets have run out of delivery slots, smaller businesses are now offering local deliveries whilst providing safe digital payments options. They are also selling goods that the big supermarkets have run out of because traditional supply chains have been interrupted.
Could the Right Use Case Push the U.S. Over the Edge of Real-Time Payments Adoption?
New York City, while a world leader in countless ways, has only just made it possible to access the subway with contactless technology. Something a commuter in London, for example, has taken for granted for many years. While America’s tech companies, manufacturers and retailers have been constantly modernizing, the country’s payment methods and habits lag behind much of the rest of the world.
Why the COVID-19 Pandemic Makes Immediate Payments Growth Mission Critical
COVID-19 continues to shake the world, and the payments industry is playing a critical role in the response to, and recovery from, this pandemic. There has been a shift in preferred payment methods as many consumers seek to avoid cash and embrace modern, digital payments.
Payments Modernization and Cross-Border Payment Corridors: How Nordics’ P27 Is Leading the Pack
The understandably large level of attention generated by the Nordic region’s P27 initiative is the antithesis of its relatively small place on the global map. Much of that is down to the impressive scope of its ambition: to build the world’s most cutting-edge, cross-border payments system, encompassing multiple currencies and payment types (including real-time), plus building out the services to sit on top of the rails, which will drive further value.
Taking the Pulse of Biometric Authentication in 2020
Growing demand for digital payment methods in recent years, including a plethora of mobile payments and person-to-person payment applications, has already put biometric authentication firmly at the forefront of payments and fintech. Moreover, the COVID-19 global health crisis has introduced new norms that have discouraged non-essential physical interaction, which has further boosted the popularity of digital payment alternatives. Already in March, CNBC noted that there had been a surge in the number of Americans preferring ‘”tap and go” transactions through digital wallets, like Apple Pay or Google Pay, overwhelmingly secured with biometric (mainly fingerprint) authentication.
How Does Brazil Measure Up Against the 5 Key Indicators of Real-time Payments Success?
Real-time payments, or immediate payments, have experienced explosive adoption in many markets around the world. While some have developed their own approach to deploying real-time payments, the COVID-19 pandemic has served as an accelerant in the implementation of real-time payments and digital modernization. With real-time payments volumes now increasing in some markets due to the pandemic, it’s important to look at how Brazil measures up against these 5 key indicators of successful implementations and to understand how the country can drive adoption of its new real-time system, PIX.
Why the Value of Real-Time Payments is Not in the Fees Charged
I recently hosted a webinar with payments experts to delve into ACI’s Prime Time for Real-Time research and uncover what the rise in global transactions means for the U.S. market. I was joined by Steve Ledford, product executive for the RTP Network of The Clearing House, Reed Luhtanen, executive director of the U.S. Faster Payments Council, and Peter Hazou, director of solutions for Financial Services at Microsoft. We investigated the unique factors that have so far hindered ubiquitous adoption of real-time payments in the U.S., as well as those that highlight the market’s position to capitalize on the global rise of real-time, and deliver value to financial institutions, merchants, corporates and consumers.
Envisioning a Cross-Border, Real-Time Payments Ecosystem in Southeast Asia
Southeast Asia is emerging as the center of real-time, cross-border payments growth, with ISO 20022 and QR codes as critical components, according to new research published by ACI and Kapronasia, a leading financial technology market research and consulting firm. Envisioning a pan-regional, real-time payments ecosystem in Southeast Asia sees real-time payments as a key enabler for the Southeast Asian economy, especially as the region pursues economic recovery and further digital transformation on the back of COVID-19.
Three Must-Haves for Immediate Payments Success in Brazil
Recently, the Central Bank of Brazil (BCB) announced its plan to launch the country’s first instant payments scheme, PIX, which is expected to be operational by November 2020. PIX will be mandatory for all larger banks in Brazil and will work as a central infrastructure with non-stop availability. The scheme will also be based on the ISO 20022 messaging standard, which features data-rich messaging and facilitates greater availability, speed, convenience and security. Ultimately, this open environment will be a major catalyst for innovation.