Analyzing Annoyance? Online Shopping Behavior at the Checkout
If you’re standing at the checkout in a brick-and-mortar store, it’s easy enough to see when fellow customers become agitated and annoyed. Impatiently checking the time, audible ‘harrumphs’ and negative body language are all tell-tale signs that the payment process is not proceeding as smoothly as desired. But how does this frustration manifest itself in online shopping behavior?
The tyranny of distance removes all physical cues, but it is crucial for online retailer to identify and address points of friction, in order to improve the overall digital shopping experience and maximize conversion rates.
Tracking purchases online, for example through clicks and conversions, does yield data that payment providers can use to refine checkout and digital payment processes. It has been shown, for instance, that including the three most popular alternative methods of payment in any given market can increase a merchant’s conversion rate by up to 30%. Services such as those offered by ClickTale go deeper, with heatmap analytics and other powerful tools to understand online shopping consumer behavior. But a another recent study may add something new to payment providers’ and merchants’ analytical arsenal – the ability to analyze annoyance in shopping online.
New insights into online shopping behavior
Jeffrey Jenkins, an information systems expert, led the research into how negative emotions – including anger, frustration, and confusion – can be detected through mouse movements.
According to his Brigham Young University study, "How mouse movements can determine emotions", when consumers are upset or confused, mouse movements become jagged and imprecise, rather than following a straight or gently curving path. Somewhat counterintuitively, upset consumers also tended to move their mouse cursor more slowly. The ability to process sufficient data in order to draw such conclusions was a requirement for the study, which could potentially have a range of practical implications for web developers seeking to reduce pain points that generate negative emotions.
“Traditionally it has been very difficult to pinpoint when a user becomes frustrated, leading them to not come back to a site,” said Jenkins. “Being able to sense a negative emotional response, we can adjust the website experience to eliminate stress or to offer help.”
Reducing friction at the checkout
The resulting digital technology has already been patented and spun off to a local startup company that holds the license. How exactly this may be developed for use in the payments and eCommerce space remains to be seen, but the continued “API-ization” of payments means that it is conceivable that common shop plugins already used by merchants could quite easily integrate this analytical technology.
As a result, payment providers and merchants could gain a more precise understanding of the aspects of the online shopper checkout experience that evoke negative emotions. Just how annoyed do online shoppers get when a page loads slowly? Does confusion really reign when users are taken off page to complete their payment? Is frustration evident when certain types of payment methods are not available, or fail to function as they should? What about 3D Secure? These are all things that can increase friction, and ultimately lead to a high shopping cart abandonment rate – the last thing a merchant wants. A better understanding and actionable insights can only be a benefit, especially when optimizing conversion rates can have such an impact on revenues.
But what about mobile?
The study in question is predicated on the presence of a mouse cursor, but with mobile shopping set to overtake traditional desktop eCommerce (mobile share of all online purchases is expected to be 40% by the end of the 2015 and the 50% “tipping point” not far behind), both payment providers and their merchants may be focusing attention elsewhere. A “mobile first” strategy will mean reducing friction and improving mobile payment flows, and gaining a deeper understanding of mobile shopping behavior. Whether a similar “analysis of annoyance” will be possible on touchscreen devices, via swipes and taps, remains to be seen (though the BYU study tentatively suggests it is possible).
The bottom line is that payment providers and merchants need to keep an open mind to using these sorts of new digital technology and tools that are being developed, in order to optimize payment setup across all channels.
Related blog posts
Driving Toward Innovation in Digital Banking User Experience
The need for delivering on a user experience strategy necessitates the use of common and sometimes confusing lingo like CX, UX, information architecture, UX design and UI design. It introduces ways to gain deeper understanding of customers through methods like personas, journey mapping and Kano analysis. It commands phrases like customer-centric, experience-driven, and ideation/visioning. In the past 4 months, I have interviewed more than half a dozen agencies to engage one that could go beyond the buzzwords and the methods described above. I want to be convinced that great and meaningful changes can happen to UI’s. After all, talk is cheap.
Cross-Border Payments: The Next Big Frontier
It is no secret that the majority of European banks and financial institutions are currently faced with making big and strategic decisions: The pan-European instant payment initiative is due to go live in 2017, new regulations such as PSD2 will come into effect soon and the digitalisation of the sector is well under way, with customers demanding new services and payments methods.
How Digitalized Banking Will Force Collaboration And Other Key Highlights From Sibos
Returning from Sibos in Geneva, I am in a reflective mood on the main take-aways from this year’s event, key updates about the state of the payments industry—and what to expect in 2017.
Same Day ACH in the U.S.: Which Companies will take Advantage of Faster Payments—and Why
The faster payments movement in the U.S. could be the first opportunity for corporate entities to realize true Straight through Processing (STP) of payments. Anyone involved in payments for corporate entities can see the benefits of this type of new payment opportunity.
Immediate Payments Are "Necessary"—And the Banks Know It
Who says banks are dinosaurs? They just have a lot of innovation to juggle to keep pace. There are so many new initiatives to address—so how should banks prioritize?
Is Blockchain Ready?
SIBOS is just around the corner and blockchain will undoubtedly be one of the buzzwords at this year’s event (as is the case at pretty much every payments or fintech conference these days). The big question on everyone’s mind is whether blockchain really has the potential to change the global systems that process trillions of dollars in payments every day or whether it’s hype. I recently sat down with Paul Thomalla, ACI’s senior vice president of global corporate relations, to delve deeper into the topic, a topic on which he has just published a white paper.
SEPA Instant Payments: The Importance of Real-Time Hubs in a Global Market
An epiphany is happening across Europe—and across the global markets. I’m not talking about the realization of Brexit (and that we’re all going to need to make it work). But rather, the realization that payment hubs that were brought in to manage SEPA batch credit transfers and direct debits are not going to be capable in the real-time world of SEPA Instant Payments.
Cross-Border Payments: ready, set, go…
The cross-border payments market is probably the most important industry in the world. Trillions of dollars are exchanged every day to cover the settlement of everything from multi-billion-dollar company investments, through to the value of the perishable cargo on the ship that’s stuck in port, all the way down to that rather nice holiday rental I’ve got my eye on for next summer. International payments are essential to everyone, in every country in the world.
Fintechs seeking bank charters? Yes, really.
The common understanding in the industry is that, as bank regulators gradually inch their way toward regulating financial technology companies that transact banking, lending, and payments, the fintech companies are retreating, trying to move as far from those regulators as possible, for as long as possible. The industry narrative is that, when the regulatory heat eventually gets too high, the fintechs will change business models, or combine with other companies, or seek to be acquired by the very banks they now compete against.
Payments Are Changing Big Banks
Once viewed as a necessity, they can reposition themselves to prove valuable in the value chain.