ISO 20022: Laying the foundations for the path to global interoperability
"Follow the yellow brick road," the Munchkins said to Dorothy after she landed in Oz. And to me, the path to interoperability on a global scale is laid out in front of us as clear as the yellow brick road was for Dorothy.
The first brick on the road to digital banking, a prerequisite of international interoperability, has been laid with the move to immediate payments. Another brick has been laid now that the industry has reached consensus that ISO 20022 is the right language for us to use to send and receive immediate payments.
The ISO 20022 Real-Time Payments Group has launched its first draft of the data flows or the 'rule book' for the standard for real-time payments, and many other parties are working furiously behind the scenes to enable interoperability.
However, along any journey, crossroads of some shape or form will be encountered, where important decisions will need to be made that will determine the direction one takes.
The biggest of these will undoubtedly be "how do we handle settlement for cross-border immediate payments?”
Currently, there are three main models for settlement; Deferred Net Settlement (DNS), pre-funding and real-time (or line-by-line as the Australians call it).
- DNS is simple; payments are sent (funds are available immediately) at one point in time and then netted and settled in another according to the settlement cycle. This has high settlement risk and can choke innovation as the longer the settlement cycles, the greater the risk. Smaller players find this environment particularly difficult in terms of participation.
- Pre-funding requires each party to deposit cash to the expected value of its commitments for the next settlement cycle, so this removes the settlement risk as should a member fail, they have already provided the funds to cover their liabilities. This goes some way to opening up the scheme to the smaller players; however, again if there are long settlement cycles, barriers can still remain due to higher amounts of cash required. This does not suit challenger banks or non-bank payments service providers that have small or no deposits to use for pre-funding.
- Real-time removes the settlement risk, and the barriers to entry, however the central bank has to run a real-time settlement infrastructure that operates at the same time as the immediate payments scheme (usually 24*7*365) to accommodate this.
Further difficulties arise: for example someone in the UK, which is moving to a pre-funding model and has a settlement cycle of 3 hours, and someone in The Netherlands where the cycle could run every 15 minutes, want to pay each other.
Who takes the settlement risk, considering the cash and collateral is held by the central bank in a different country? How to get the two to marry up is going to be the tricky bit.
"Why can't we all just move to a real-time system?" The Australian New Payments Platform is going to be the first example of a line-by-line settlement model, so the technology is as yet unproven. The technology capability required to process the number of transactions in Australia is achievable, however the volumes are vastly larger in countries such as the U.S. and China.
Would a real-time system be able to cope? Will other countries’ appetites be big enough to foot the bill to invest in such a system?
Only time will tell. For now, those addressing the interoperability challenge will need to come up with an answer to "which direction do we take?" around settlement, before we can truly achieve global interoperability.
I will be discussing the benefits and adoptions challenges surrounding ISO 20022, and the future impact to cross-border payments and correspondent banking during Sibos. Click here to see the full schedule of sessions.
Related Blog Posts
Customer Innovation: Erste Bank [Q&A]
The global banking sector is becoming both more strategically focused and technologically advanced, responding to rising consumer expectations while trying to defend market share against an increasing array of competitors. A great deal of emphasis is being placed on digitizing core business processes, and reassessing organizational structures and internal talent to be better prepared for the future of banking.
Regulating for Real-Time: The Role of Government in Payments Modernization
Dr. Leo Lipis and Craig Ramsey, Head of Real-Time Payments for ACI Worldwide, continue their discussion on real-time payments and the findings of the new white paper, Get More from Real-Time.
Issuing and Acquiring in a Real-Time and Open Payments Ecosystem – The Global Picture
Dr Leo Lipis and Craig Ramsey, Head of Real-Time Payments for ACI Worldwide, continue their discussion on real-time payments, stemming from the findings of the new white paper, Get More from Real-Time. See part one.
Four Questions to Drive Your Retail Banking Payments Strategy in 2019
I keep hearing that it’s “an exciting time to be in payments,” and I certainly agree that there is a lot of noise. However, when I look below the surface, I’d argue that the interesting activity is not with the payment itself, but with all the related events and steps in the value chain.
What Can the Re-Regulation of Other Industries Tell Us About Open Banking One Year On?
UK Open Banking just reached its first birthday milestone (on January 13 to be precise) and given my own commentary – including in the ACI blog – on this topic, the first anniversary of Open Banking in the UK certainly won’t pass without a debrief on the progress that’s been made and what challenges lie ahead.
Instant Payments in Italy – And Beyond: Lessons from Il Salone dei Pagamenti
ACI was invited back to Il Salone dei Pagamenti – Italy’s premier payments event organized by the Italian Banking Association (ABI) – to participate in a panel, “SEPA Inst – the Future.” As expected, the session was packed with stats and advice for a more efficient roll out of instant payments – in Italy and beyond.
To Regulate Or Not To Regulate – Is That Thy Question?
Debates are healthy, and as someone who spent a little time during my college years dabbling around the edges of the speech and debate team, I can tell you it’s something that I personally relish. A chance to really talk through the pros and cons of an argument and lay out the bare facts… and then be judged based not only on those facts, but on the presentation and power of persuasion—sign me up!
Request for Pay – What Does It Mean For Financial Institutions?
What do banks – one with $60B+ in assets, one a mid-size regional bank, and one, a small innovative credit union – have in common with payment networks and the ‘Big 4’ consulting firms? They were all part of the first ACI #PaymentsForBreakfast event in North America! The theme was real-time payments, but the focus was more specifically on Request for Pay.
Why Open Banking Might Need to Rely on a Magic Illusion of 24x7 Availability
The adage “the more things change, the more they stay the same” appears to ring true when applied to the early phases of the evolution of open banking (or open payments). Especially when you contrast it with the early days of ATM withdrawals; particularly those made in the dead of night so you could pay cash for your after-party greasy feast.
Sibos Preview: The Five Trends Transforming Real-Time Payments
Real-time is now a reality, with more than 30 schemes live around the world. And real-time is in the spotlight as banks and financial service providers make their way to Sydney for Sibos 2018. What better time to look ahead at the key trends that are going to shape the ongoing development of real-time payments.