The Audacity of Payments
How do you define audacious? I define it by way of example, more specifically, by someone who traverses the contiguous 48 states over 5 months in a well-worn Ford Escape.
Though this scribe is not too audacious, I had the pleasure of meeting up with the individual referenced in my aforementioned example. Some of you might be familiar with Bailey Reutzel, an exceptional fintech reporter who’s spent the past few years at PaymentsSource and American Banker. She’s now somewhere on ‘the road to find out’ (a la the former Cat Stevens)…chronicling the philosophy of money/value in a great blog called Moneytripping.
Bailey and I met up at our recent R2 retail conference in Chicago, which occurred just after Loolapalooza, one of the world’s best music festivals that she also attended (an interesting transition from seeing innovative acts like TV on the Radio and Alabama Shakes to seeing innovative retailers like Domino’s and Nordstrom).
So Bailey, why embark on this tour?
The concept of money and value is changing drastically—that’s part of this vast and rapidly-evolving digital currency revolution. How do people relate to money, what do they think is valuable, how do they interact with the financial system—these are topics I’ve wanted to cover for some time. I was recently at a conference in NYC and a young dad was talking about an experience he had with his kid. He gave a physical dollar to his son. His son, probably 9 or 10-years-old, knew it was a dollar, but associated paper money with charity drives at school or handing money to homeless people on the street. When it came to buying toys, he only associated plastic with that process. That’s when I started wondering how the nature of money changed between demographics and cultures.
The tangential concept I want to undertake is ‘what is value' as it relates to the ‘sharing economy.’ Take Couch Surfing, a great example of an informal economy…or Task Rabbit, an example of the odd job economy…or Lollapalooza, a volunteer economy. Each of these economies is prevalent within my generation, the millennial generation, and millennials are making their own definitions for all aspects of their day-to-day lives.
Initially, I was finding it challenging to define what I was exploring. But as I've done some research on the road, I've found a term that I think applies to what most of my reports have turned into: political economics. It's the study of production and trade and how that relates to culture and customs, the government and politics and both equality and inequality. It's a branch of moral philosophy, which I've always been drawn to writing about.
So can you talk a little about what you’re seeing, regionally speaking?
It’s no surprise that the coasts are predominantly early adopters of technology, the middle of the country…not so much. Bitcoin has a libertarian bent. The new conservative in the Midwest is a pseudo-libertarian. Early on in my travels, I came to the realization that Bitcoin and the Midwest work together—there are parallels between the beliefs in the Midwest of and the tenets of these decentralized virtual currencies.
Ah, good ol’ Midwestern ideals. Do many Midwesterners know what bitcoin is?
Many at least know about it, though it’s not pushed as heavily as it is on the coasts. Bitcoin aligns with the Midwestern contingent that is very much against government ‘spying,’ for lack of a better word.
Evoking thoughts of Edward Snowden.
You were among the earliest trackers of bitcoin and alternative currencies. What is it about virtual that’s resonated with you? Anything in particular minus what you discussed above?
I’m interested in alternatives to the status quo. Bitcoin provided that, but now it’s being appropriated. Ultimately, it’s still very much alternative. Because as Bitcoin gets appropriated, because it's open source, new alternatives can surface.
What’s your stance on tracking transactions? Where’s the line between privacy and transparency?
Millennials are seen as the demographic that doesn’t care about privacy, hence their very public social media feeds. And the idea that there are ultimate secrets is dead—many of us are more open as well as open-minded, which will lead to even fewer secrets. And that's not a bad thing.
I personally don’t care if the government wants to look at my transactions. Ultimately, I feel the government’s job is to protect us, its citizens, and so if they need to monitor transactions to do that, then I say go for it. But I see the other side. Ultimately there's a fine line between surveillance and Minority Report.
What do you think is next on the horizon, from an overall payments trend?
I think it’s all about peer the peer. Unlike in the past, where the large corporates had direct involvement, people will be able to handle all aspects of payments directly.
Do you think cash is king? Is it the king currency?
Cash will continue to be a big part of the economy. Think small corner stores, the bodegas in NYC that don’t accept cards; they’ve long been cash-only and will continue to be cash-only. They don’t want to pay fees. And consumers understand that and will gladly accept that decision.
The ‘cash is king’ mantra has come back around, and hearkens back to fiat currency as a low-cost public good so that consumers can interact with the economic system. We’ve moved away from that to an extent—with private companies and closed-looped networks operating digitally. With the rise of bitcoin and other alternative cryptocurrencies, we might find a digital equivalent to cash.
As Bailey continues her Moneytripping tour, you can follow along at http://moneytripping.com/.
Related blog posts
Liquidity Management and Instant Payments: Why Banks Must Act Now
With the pan-European Instant Payments Scheme due to go live in November this year, real-time payments are about to become a reality for many businesses and consumers in Europe. Our own research shows that the demand for faster and innovative banking services among consumers and business is high.
Rapid Rails for Real Time Payments
As the NACHA PAYMENTS conference arrives in Austin, Texas this week, we spoke with Steve Ledford, Senior Vice President, Product and Strategy at The Clearing House (TCH) about the key issues conference participants will be talking about: same day ACH, real-time payments and Request for Pay transactions, among other topics.
The Constant of Change and the Future of Commercial Banking
Let’s clarify this before I lose anyone; the self-proclaimed “pioneer of wisdom,” noted Greek philosopher Heraclitus, is credited with the saying Panta rhei, "everything flows." More commonly, you have probably heard this as “the only constant is change,” but either way, this teaching has withstood the test of time, as it is not only applicable, but feels like a worldly truth when I find myself talking about today’s transaction banking landscape. A robust time of change is upon us; one that has brought us to the precipice of a new era in banking. Understanding the driving forces behind this change as well as embracing new business models will be a key to success, or even to survival.
Is There A Blockchain In Your Future
Marc Andressen, noted Internet entrepreneur and venture capitalist who co-authored the first web browser, called blockchain the most important invention since the Internet. An executive at BNP Paribas compared the technology to the steam or combustion engine in its potential to transform the world of finance and beyond. The Economist dubbed it “The Trust Machine.”
Real-Time Payments and The Evolution of Debit
As the NACHA PAYMENTS conference kicks off next week, we connected with Sarah Grotta, Director of Debit Advisory Service with the Mercator Advisory Group about a variety of timely issues that have the payments industry buzzing. Sarah shared her thoughts on real-time payments and Same Day ACH, credit-push transactions—and when consumers will finally adopt digital wallets.
Are You Falling Behind in the Race to Real-Time? How to Build Your Business Case for Immediate Payments
We’re beginning to see a divide in the payments industry, not just between incumbents and new players, but a sub-divide between banks themselves. Some traditional financial institutions have been able to adopt agile processes, whilst others are yet to start their journey toward a more nimble future. So why are some of these banks continuing in their old mode, like giant ships, slow to change direction? Could it be that the iceberg that sinks the move to real-time is only about technology ‘above the surface,’ and organisational issues lurk below the water line?
The Wonderful Ways to Pay Your Taxes
April (or rather mid-April), that time of year when many Americans frantically assemble their W2’s and countless other tax-related forms. With the tax deadline looming, we conducted outreach to a select group of consumers to learn more about their tax paying habits.
Driving Faster Payments in the U.S. and Around the Globe
In advance of next month’s NACHA PAYMENTS conference, we wanted to connect with some of the companies that are driving real-time payments around the globe. VocaLink is one such organization. The company is providing the central infrastructure software to The Clearing House in the US for its Real-time Payments System. VocaLink operates the UK national payments infrastructure, which processes 90 percent of UK salaries, and also implemented the FAST service in Singapore and PromptPay in Thailand, enabling international faster payments. In September of last year, ACI and VocaLink announced a partnership to offer a complete end-to-end immediate payments solution to launch a domestic or regional immediate payments network.
The Middle East Presents Retailers A Growing Opportunity But Faces Two Challenges
36% of Middle East residents are digital shoppers1 and are expected to spend $19B2 online in 2017; with this spend figure rapidly growing to $34B in 2021. Although cash is the preferred method of transacting, the region is edging toward a digital society. In the UAE and Saudi Arabia, nearly two thirds of the population has smartphones—fueling shopping online growth.3 This prevents retailers new growth opportunities.
Whose Liability is it Anyways? The Rise of Bots in Financial Services
The implication of driverless cars, in terms of liability, is fascinating. For starters, in a world where vehicles are all completely self-driving, it would (technically) be impossible to drive under the influence, so this alone will eliminate many accidents. But, when there is an accident (and there inevitably will be), who will be liable for the damages? The car manufacturer? Or the developer of the software that runs the car? What will happen to insurance companies and contracts when there is no liability to insure against? It’s thought-provoking that this scenario will touch a wide range of industries.