The true cost of cash
One of the hot topics for the financial industry, the tech industry, retailers and consumers has been the development of payments via a mobile phone. Most of the talk is about how adoption will be impacted by the various technologies and which one will win out, or the fact that U.S. consumers are very concerned about the security of their financial information and how mobile transactions are processed.
One aspect of the conversation that has not gotten as much attention is the growing perception that cash may not be the best payment option, even though it is the most universally accepted.
Everyone is familiar with the saying “you need to spend money to make money,” but probably don’t know that it costs the U. S. Treasury more to produce pennies and nickels than the face value of the coins. The penny costs 2.4 cents to produce, and the nickel costs 11.2 cents! Canada recently decided to stop producing pennies for this reason. But that’s not the only cost associated with cash. There are costs to storing, moving and protecting it. Some estimates show that governments could save as much as 1% of the annual GDP by going cashless. Certain countries, such as Italy, are already mandating large payments can’t be made with cash due to the fact that they lose €10 billion each year handling physical currency.
Cash has been around so long there’s a psychological barrier to imagining a world without it. However, most people have no problem using credit cards to make purchases in store or online, or using services like PayPal to pay virtually. So what will it take to show the true cost of cash? For consumers, the talk about moving to mobile often centers around convenience and time saving, but there needs to be more education around the true cost of cash, which is generally hidden from consumer view. Perhaps one benefit of mobile wallets, the increased opportunity to receive special offers based on loyalty programs or location-based promotions, can increase the value of virtual vs. physical cash.
As one member of the financial community recently told me “While it might cost more to produce currency notes, it costs much less for merchants to accept cash as compared to debit cards or credit cards or any other form of ePayments.” With that said, would the merchant community get behind this idea?
At the end of the day I think we’ll see cash for quite some time and live with the fact that it’s a costly (no pun intended) requirement. But the bigger question might be how quickly will consumers determine the adoption of mobile money based on the benefit to the individual?
Related blog posts
Payments Buzzwords (yet even more)
Phew, I’m exhausted from this whirlwind week of industry sessions galore at Money20/20. As we approach the weekend, I’m ready to kick back and…wait a minute, I think it’s time for a third (and perhaps final…or not) edition of 2017 Payments Buzzwords.
2017’s Payment Buzzwords in October…Part Deux
Money2020 day two (err three) brings with it a few things: much-needed alarm clocks, double espressos instead of medium coffees, and an updated buzzword bingo card. Yesterday was a jam packed, wall to wall payments holiday and the party continues today with another great agenda. But I digress, to the buzzwords….
Payment Geeks (umm, I mean Professionals) Unite!
The beacon in the desert has been lit and the anticipation is palpable—for the next 3+ days, more than 10,000 of us will debate, discuss and help shape the future of our industry. From the amazing main stage lineup to the top of the line track sessions to the overflowing show floor, this week will surely not disappoint. So as we await the start of this year’s Money20/20, I wanted to share three areas I literally am on the edge of my seat for:
How Will Insurers Modernize Bill Payment Systems?
When looking for a date in college I had to ask 13 girls before one said yes. The consumer experience at insurance companies isn’t much better. 80 percent of shoppers abandon during checkout. Of those who do sign up, 34 percent intend to leave their insurer next year.
Detecting Internal Fraud by ‘Breaking Bad’
There has been no shortage of news stories around the banking industry and its vulnerability to internal fraud, particularly that the industry has limited internal surveillance. Internal fraud has proven to be news-driven (and news-worthy); it’s a great feature lead-in story and scintillating red-meat for mass consumption. Internal fraud events are obviously a reputational risk for banks, but then take a huge turn into regulatory risk territory, before winding up squarely a legal risk (and the headline-grabbing fines that come with it). Finally, a strategic and market risk bubble up as customers are lost to competitors.
2017’s Payment Buzzwords in October…and Other Insanity
Is it just me or are things a little insane right now? From clowns wreaking havoc across the country to category 4 hurricanes also wreaking havoc (later and later into the year) to a certain presidential election (Sunday’s debate was, how you say, actually, it’s difficult for me to put into words) to now…Christmas decorations in October! And don’t forget the pop-up Halloween stores that arrived in August…August! So let the Rantings begin.
Integrated Fraud Prevention Tools in an Omni-channel World
In a previous blog post, I discussed the way in which technology partnerships are driving the evolution of the traditional payment gateway model, with value-added services becoming an increasingly important aspect of a payment gateway proposition. Real-time fraud prevention is one of many potential value-added services that a payment gateway can offer, but one that deserves particular focus, as the trend towards omni-channel commerce presents new challenges around fraud management.
How Digitalized Banking Will Force Collaboration And Other Key Highlights From Sibos
Returning from Sibos in Geneva, I am in a reflective mood on the main take-aways from this year’s event, key updates about the state of the payments industry—and what to expect in 2017.
Immediate Payments Are "Necessary"—And the Banks Know It
Who says banks are dinosaurs? They just have a lot of innovation to juggle to keep pace. There are so many new initiatives to address—so how should banks prioritize?