Taking action against the burden of legacy systems
Thursday, May 19, 2011
Posted by Louis Blatt
We know that most financial institutions are burdened, to a greater or lesser degree, by siloed legacy payment systems. Part of the problem is that the limitations of this architecture of legacy infrastructure are not immediately obvious. Individual systems function, and function well for the most part. But although they serve their individual purposes now, there is little to suggest they will be able to work together to support financial institutions as they adapt their business models to the demands of a new decade.
The sheer volume of transactions that these legacy systems are expected to handle continues to grow – placing ever growing pressure on already creaking infrastructure. The financial crisis has dramatically accelerated the pace of change and has placed acute pressure on legacy systems. It brought about unprecedented levels of consolidation and tremendous regulatory change, and is accompanied by a fast-paced revolution in technology and a changing customer demographic.
Furthermore, the payments industry is no longer the exclusive domain of established financial institutions and traditional payment processors. New entrants from non-financial industry sectors are making their presence felt and challenging long-held notions about the payments business. These new entrants have been enabled by customer-friendly regulations and fast-emerging technologies, and are gaining ground in traditional B2B and B2C spaces as well as creating and fulfilling an electronic P2P payments environment.
These new entrants come without the baggage of years in the payments space. They offer new products and services, carefully targeted and often fulfilling a niche demand, without having to compromise because of their technological limitations.
The convergence of payments and consumer technology favorites is indicative of another critical factor facing financial institutions. Consumer’s lives are increasingly digitized. Customer expectations are therefore changing rapidly. Younger customers in particular are used to services delivered online and in real time and expect similar levels of service from their financial institutions. Traditional banking brand strengths, like reliability and security have less meaning for the next generation of customers for whom speed and convenience are the key brand values, with reliability and security considered hygiene factors. And legacy systems cannot always meet these expectations.
The payments industry is therefore at a tipping point. Financial institutions need to be more proactive in the payments evolution while managing crisis-driven business pressures and new regulatory and compliance imperatives. First of all, they will need to make some prompt decisions about how to redesign or accelerate their revenue-focused and cost-focused payments strategies. New pressures threaten to overwhelm the legacy systems on which the payments business has been built.
Related blog posts
Integrated Fraud Prevention Tools in an Omni-channel World
In a previous blog post, I discussed the way in which technology partnerships are driving the evolution of the traditional payment gateway model, with value-added services becoming an increasingly important aspect of a payment gateway proposition. Real-time fraud prevention is one of many potential value-added services that a payment gateway can offer, but one that deserves particular focus, as the trend towards omni-channel commerce presents new challenges around fraud management.
The Evolving Role of Global Payment Gateways
Partnering with a payment gateway has long been a logical approach for a merchant seeking to extend their business across international borders, taking advantage of the opportunities that the globalization of eCommerce has created. But merchants eyeing up global expansion want to move more quickly than ever - the last thing they want or need in a highly competitive space is a gateway provider that either restricts their growth, or forces them to work with multiple payment service providers (PSPs) in different regions.
What Is the Link Between Payment Methods and Conversion Rates?
Checkout conversion rates are an incredibly important indicator for merchants’ bottom lines. Even minor change in website design, checkout flow, or the overall payment methods setup can noticeably impact a merchant’s conversion rate – positively or negatively.
Payment Service Providers Face Pressures from Many Sides, as Merchant Expectations Rise
The payments industry is more dynamic than ever, and despite the advances that innovation brings, the speed of change is undeniably putting pressure on traditional business models. The roles of acquiring banks and payment service providers (PSPs) – previously quite clearly defined – are blurring, and merchant demands are becoming technologically more complex.
eCommerce Payments Optimization as a Merchant Growth Strategy
In the majority of developed markets, store-based retail sales are shrinking while eCommerce and mCommerce grow at 10- 20% annually. Consequently, merchants are focused on digital commerce growth opportunities more than ever before.
Assessing the impact of the MIF Regulation interchange fee caps
The European Regulation on Interchange Fees for Card-based Payments (or the MIF Regulation for short) came into effect in December 2015. Comprised of four main areas—interchange fee caps, acquirer pricing transparency, the separation of card schemes and processing, and other supporting rules—the regulation will have a profound impact upon the European payments industry and has the potential to reshape the eCommerce payments landscape. No area, however, is poised to cause more of a commotion than the interchange fee caps. Acquirers, card issuers, and payment service providers are all affected, but the impact of interchange fee caps—and what it means for their businesses—varies considerably.
July: the hottest shopping time of the year for consumers, retailers—and fraudsters
Summer is in full swing, and while many people equate this time of year with beach-hopping and BBQs, retailers—and those of us who keep them in business— are quickly making July one of the most exciting shopping months of the year. Irresistible online sales and promotions abound, and with that, so does the risk of fraud. In fact, eCommerce fraud attempt rates in July, 2016 (1.6%) are slightly higher than fraud rates in December, 2015 (1.2%), which is the busiest holiday shopping time of the year.
Can payments really be simple Depends on whom you ask
According to the experts from Merriam-Webster, the definition of “simple” is fairly, well, simple to understand:
Consumers want access Merchants want simple global and secure opportunities How to achieve both
While riding the local commuter rail on my last leg home from NYC, I sat next to a woman who was on her smartphone shopping on what looked like a Chinese website. I smiled to myself after just having spent the day talking about the massive opportunities presented in the borderless world of eCommerce. The scenario was very timely as the day’s discussion centered on providing consumers with access to goods and services and the merchants’ opportunity to serve them anytime, anywhere with the payment options they desire.
There is no one size fits all approach when it comes to crossborder eCommerce strategy
Every business has its own strengths – and weaknesses – that need to be taken into account when formulating a cross-border eCommerce strategy. What has worked for one merchant is no guarantee of success for another, and the same applies to payment providers supporting merchants with global ambitions. But being able to successfully support merchants expanding internationally opens up new revenue streams and business opportunities. As CEO & Founder of PAY.ON, and ACI’s SVP Product Line Manager for Merchant Solutions, Markus Rinderer is no stranger to both the challenges and opportunities of cross-border eCommerce.