Should banks be held liable for Ponzi schemes?
Friday, December 16, 2011
Posted by ACI Worldwide
Ponzi schemes were named for Charles Ponzi after he defrauded customers out of approximately 20 million dollars back in 1920 (over $225 million today).
While the idea of paying out investors with their own money rather than any money earned legitimately via investment had been around prior to 1920, the name Ponzi become synonymous with the scheme based on the amount of publicity and high dollar loss associated with his activity (including the downfall of six financial institutions).
Over the past few years, we’ve seen a tremendous increase in the magnitude of Ponzi schemes. Fingers have been pointed at the fraudsters, as well as the SEC, and more recently, the guilty label is being extended to the financial institutions providing services for the schemes.
In recent cases, the argument made by prosecutors was that the banks were negligent in not identifying red flags for these investor accounts, making them guilty of ‘aiding and abetting’ these criminals. To be guilty of this, in most states in the US, there must be three elements: the existence of fraud, the defendant’s knowledge of the fraud and proof that the defendant provided considerable assistance to the progression of the fraud scheme. Though this is the standard primarily under US law, this does not permit international financial services firms or banks from being included in the lawsuit, as seen in the case against Banco Santander in 2010, which involved defendants from seven different nations around the world.
The question of ‘knowledge’ of the fraud and providing assistance can be a bit subjective, since the banks didn’t know directly about the scheme. The question is: if they didn’t implement the appropriate steps to look for red flags or simply failed pay attention to them, does this make them guilty? For instance, in the Madoff scheme, an activity monitoring system to detect transfers between investor and personal accounts may have triggered an internal review of the activity and shut down accounts before investors were defrauded of the full $50 billion.
So what can banks do to prevent these schemes, and also ensure they are not on the receiving end of a lawsuit? Financial institutions need to implement a sophisticated transaction monitoring tool that is flexible enough to quickly adapt to the changing fraud schemes. Activity monitoring must be implemented across the enterprise, in order to detect complex patterns of activity that may seem normal alone, but when viewed collectively may be a red flag for a large fraud scheme. Taking proactive measures to ensure that your institution is doing everything possible to prevent fraudulent schemes will help protect customers and keep your institution out of the hotseat should a new scheme appear, despite your best prevention efforts.
Related blog posts
Mobile is Transforming the Travel Sector
February in South Africa means long, hot days, and seemingly endless sunshine (interrupted only by the occasional thunderstorm). Temperatures often top 30 Celsius (that’s mid-eighties for my American friends) and nearly every day is deserving of a braai (that’s barbeque for the rest of the world). But I do spare a thought for my colleagues and friends in Boston, New York, Munich and London (amongst others) at this time of year, as they slog it out through the darkest and coldest months of winter. Who’s to blame them for seeking a bit of light escapism as they plan and book their spring and summer vacations?
Connected Devices are Opening Up New Forms of Payments and Partnerships
Of all the trends that are currently shaping – or re-shaping – the nature of payments, none is more significant than the rise of the Internet of Things (IoT). We often talk about the payments ‘ecosystem’ and the complexity that exists between the many participants that are part of this ecosystem, but this complexity will expand exponentially as millions – no, billions – of devices become internet capable.
Busting Bitcoin Myths
Bitcoin has attracted its fair share of media attention – and some negative perceptions held by merchants and consumers are hard to shake. To what extent is this justified? Or are there myths that can be dispelled? Bernard Kaufmann, General Manager, Payment21 contributed the following guest blog post to do some cryptocurrency ‘mythbusting.’
Open API Architecture is Now a Prerequisite for Merchants
Next generation merchants, including global players such as Uber and Airbnb, have built their success on openly accessible APIs and technologies that are constantly evolving to meet market needs. Because they have built their products and services on openness, they also expect an open technical setup from their payment providers. This puts pressure on payment providers to deliver state-of-the-art payment technology.
Peak Trading Is About More Than Black Friday And Cyber Monday
Many merchants will have now experienced their biggest single trading day of the year, either Black Friday or Cyber Monday, and alongside these peak trading days have focused their efforts on effective fraud managements and delivering a seamless and secure checkout experience. However, this is not universally the peak for all merchants.
Analyzing Annoyance Online Shopping Behavior at the Checkout
If you’re standing at the checkout in a brick-and-mortar store, it’s easy enough to see when fellow customers become agitated and annoyed. Impatiently checking the time, audible ‘harrumphs’ and negative body language are all tell-tale signs that the payment process is not proceeding as smoothly as desired. But how does this frustration manifest itself in online shopping behavior?
Connecting European Merchants and Chinese Shoppers via Alipay
Despite its size and reach, Alipay is still an emerging player outside its home country, China. Launched in 2004 as part of the Alibaba Group, its e-wallet is the world’s leading third party payment platform. Part of its success stems from the fact it is embedded in many of the Alibaba Group’s merchant services; including Taobao, an online consumer-to-consumer shopping platform; AliExpress, an online retail service for small Chinese merchants selling outside China; and TMall, an online platform for global brands selling to affluent Chinese shoppers.
Risky Business? Open Invoice Payments In Germany
PayProtect is used by merchants and payment service providers to manage the risk around 'purchase on account' – a payment method that is a must when operating in the large German eCommerce marketplace. Jens Kühle, MD of GPP, a company of the GFKL-Lowell Group, sat down with us to explain the specifics of eCommerce risk management in the German market.
Defining 'Openness' in the Context of eCommerce Payments
Open payments is a relatively new idea that lacks an agreed-upon definition within the payments industry. The “Openness” trend emerged from outside the industry, but disruptors and forward-thinking established players have brought it to the fore in payments.
China Singles Day Does It Have Legs
Black Friday and Cyber Monday are just around the corner, and while sales are likely to exceed the records set in 2014, what is certain is that the biggest single day of the year for eCommerce will once again be China Singles Day. Alibaba reported USD $14.3 billion in online sales on 11.11 in 2015, a 60% increase on the same day in 2014. In fact, the previous year’s total of USD $9.3 billion was eclipsed within 14 hours of trading, so Alibaba beat its own record without so much as breaking a sweat.